A framework for comparing task performance in real and virtual scenes

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe a framework for comparing task performance in real and virtual environments. Realistic graphics, rear projection, haptics and rapid prototyping are used to match the virtual scene to the real scene. We describe some preliminary placement tasks which were evaluated using eye-tracking and discuss our future plans for this framework.

REFERENCES

• 1: K. Cater , A. Chalmers , G. Ward, Detail to attention: exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering, Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics workshop on Rendering, June 25-27, 2003, Leuven, Belgium
• 2: Halper, N., Mellin, M., Duke, D., and Strothotte, T. 2005. Implicational rendering: Drawing on latent human knowledge. In ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (to appear).
• 3: Hand, C. 1997. A survey of 3-d interaction techniques. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 16(5), 269--281.
• 4: Hayhoe, M. M., Shrivastava, A., Mruczek, R., and Pelz, J. 2003. Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. In Journal of Vision, vol. 3, 49--63.
• 5: Sarah Howlett , John Hamill , Carol O'Sullivan, An experimental approach to predicting saliency for simplified polygonal models, Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 07-08, 2004, Los Angeles, California [doi>10.1145/1012551.1012562]
• 6: Johansson, R. S., Westling, G., Bckstrm, A., and Flanagan, J. R. 2001. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. In The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21 (17), 6917--6932.
• 7: Ling, Y., and Hurlbert, A. 2004. Color and size interactions in a real 3d object similarity task. In The Journal of Vision, vol. 4, 721--734.
• 8: Benjamin Lok , Samir Naik , Mary Whitton , Frederick P. Brooks Jr., Effects of Handling Real Objects and Avatar Fidelity On Cognitive Task Performance in Virtual Environments, Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003, p.125, March 22-26, 2003
• 9: Betty J. Mohler , William B. Thompson , Sarah Creem-Regehr , Herbert L. Pick , William Warren , John J. Rieser , Peter Willemsen, Visual motion influences locomotion in a treadmill virtual environment, Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 07-08, 2004, Los Angeles, California [doi>10.1145/1012551.1012554]
• 10: Morvan, Y., and Mcnamara, A. 2003. Assessing the visual perception impact of indirect lighting under different levels of illumination. a psychophysical experiment. In Proceedings of Eurographics Ireland.
• 11: Olds, E. S., and Fockler, K. A. 2004. Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search? In Perception, vol. 33, 195--216.
• 12: Pelz, J. B., Canosa, R., Babcock, J., and Barber, J. 2001. Visual perception in familiar, complex tasks. In Proceedings of the ICIP, vol. 2, 12--15.
• 13: Sundstedt, V., Chalmers, A., Cater, K., and Debattista, K. 2004. Top-down visual attention for efficient rendering of task related scenes. In Vision, Modelling and Visualization, 209--216.
• 14: Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 560--571.
• 15: Benjamin Watson , Neff Walker , Peter Woytiuk , William Ribarsky, Maintaining Usability During 3D Placement Despite Delay, Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003, p.133, March 22-26, 2003

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Interaction techniques

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism

Keywords:
attention, real and virtual environments, task performance, visual perception