ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Experimental investigation of PHY layer rate control and frequency selection in 802.11-based ad-hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (231 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Experimental approaches to wireless network design and analysis table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
SESSION: Multihop wireless measurements table of contents
Pages: 41 - 45  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-026-4
Authors
Zhibin Wu  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Sachin Ganu  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Ivan Seskar  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
D. Raychaudhuri  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1080148.1080157
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an experimental investigation of the performance impact of two important PHY layer design options that arise in 802.11 ad-hoc networks. In particular, throughput results are provided for multi-hop ad-hoc networks with and without PHY auto-rate control and for single vs. multiple frequencies. The study is motivated by the fact that default 802.11-based ad-hoc networks using commercially preset auto-rate PHY and a single frequency channel suffer from performance degradations caused by link quality fluctuations and MAC layer self-interference respectively. A baseline ad-hoc network scenario is set up on the ORBIT radio grid testbed at Rutgers and is used to determine end-to-end multi-hop flow throughput with default rate control and single channel operation. These results are then compared with those obtained with multiple channels and alternative PHY-rate selection methods demonstrating the potential for significant performance improvements. We observed significant improvements in end-to-end flow throughput, as much as 4x for multiple channel vs. single channel and 3x for optimally controlled PHY rate vs auto-rate.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Agilent Technology, Inc. "Agilent E4438C Vector Signal Generator Data Sheet", http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5988-4039EN.pdf
 
4
B. Awerbuch, D. Holmer, H. Rubens, "High Throughput Route Selection in Multi-Rate Ad Hoc Wireless Networks", Proceedings of WONS'2004, January 2004, pp. 251--268.
5
6
7
 
8
IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee, "Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications", IEEE Standard 802.11, 1999
 
9
D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, "Dynamic Source Routing in Ad hoc Wireless Networks", Mobile Computing, T. Imielinski and H. Korth, Eds., Kluwer Publishers, 1996, ch. 5, pp. 153--181.
10
 
11
 
12
A. Raniwala and T. Chiueh, "Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE 802.11-based Multi-channel Wireless Mesh Network", IEEE Infocom, March 2005.
 
13
D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu and M. Singh, "Overview of the ORBIT Radio Grid Testbed for Evaluation of Next-Generation Wireless Network Protocols", Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2005.
 
14
Z. Wu and D. Raychaudhuri, "D-LSMA: Distributed Link Scheduling Multiple Access Protocol for QoS in Ad-hoc Networks", Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM '04. IEEE Vol.3, Nov. 2004, pp. 1670 -- 1675
 
15
 
16
Wireless Tools for Linux, http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/ Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/Tools.htm


Collaborative Colleagues:
Zhibin Wu: colleagues
Sachin Ganu: colleagues
Ivan Seskar: colleagues
D. Raychaudhuri: colleagues