ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Surrogate scoring for improved metasearch precision
Full text PdfPdf (325 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Salvador, Brazil
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 583 - 584  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-034-5
Authors
Steven M. Beitzel  Illinois Institute of Technology
Eric C. Jensen  Illinois Institute of Technology
Ophir Frieder  Illinois Institute of Technology
Abdur Chowdhury  America Online
Greg Pass  America Online
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1076034.1076139
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We describe a method for improving the precision of metasearch results based upon scoring the visual features of documents' surrogate representations. These surrogate scores are used during fusion in place of the original scores or ranks provided by the underlying search engines. Visual features are extracted from typical search result surrogate information, such as title, snippet, URL, and rank. This approach specifically avoids the use of search engine-specific scores and collection statistics that are required by most traditional fusion strategies. This restriction correctly reflects the use of metasearch in practice, in which knowledge of the underlying search engines' strategies cannot be assumed. We evaluate our approach using a precision-oriented test collection of manually-constructed binary relevance judgments for the top ten results from ten web search engines over 896 queries. We show that our visual fusion approach significantly outperforms the rCombMNZ fusion algorithm by 5.71%, with 99% confidence, and the best individual web search engine by 10.9%, with 99% confidence.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Fox, E. and Shaw, J.A. Combination of Multiple Searches. NIST, TREC-2, 1994.
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
7


Collaborative Colleagues:
Steven M. Beitzel: colleagues
Eric C. Jensen: colleagues
Ophir Frieder: colleagues
Abdur Chowdhury: colleagues
Greg Pass: colleagues