ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities
Full text PdfPdf (133 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Salvador, Brazil
SESSION: User studies table of contents
Pages: 449 - 456  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-034-5
Authors
Jaime Teevan  MIT, CSAIL, Cambridge, MA
Susan T. Dumais  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Eric Horvitz  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 59,   Downloads (12 Months): 457,   Citation Count: 76
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1076034.1076111
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We formulate and study search algorithms that consider a user's prior interactions with a wide variety of content to personalize that user's current Web search. Rather than relying on the unrealistic assumption that people will precisely specify their intent when searching, we pursue techniques that leverage implicit information about the user's interests. This information is used to re-rank Web search results within a relevance feedback framework. We explore rich models of user interests, built from both search-related information, such as previously issued queries and previously visited Web pages, and other information about the user such as documents and email the user has read and created. Our research suggests that rich representations of the user and the corpus are important for personalization, but that it is possible to approximate these representations and provide efficient client-side algorithms for personalizing search. We show that such personalization algorithms can significantly improve on current Web search.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adler, L. M. (1957). A modification of Kendall's tau for the case of arbitrary ties in both rankings. Journal of the American Statistical Society, 52: 33--35.
 
2
Anick, P. (2004). Using terminological feedback for Web search refinement: a log-based study. In Proceedings of WWW '04, 89--95.
 
3
 
4
Budzik, J. and Hammond, K. (1999). Watson: Anticipating and contextualizing information needs. In Proceedings of ASISIT '99, 727--740.
5
 
6
 
7
Google Personal. http://labs.google.com/personalized
 
8
Hawking, D. and Craswell, N. (2001). Overview of the TREC-2001 Web Track. In Proceedings of TREC '01, 61--68.
9
10
11
12
 
13
Kritikopoulos, A. and Sideri, M. (2003). The Compass Filter: Search engine result personalization using Web communities. In Proceedings of ITWP.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Nielsen, J. Personalization is overrated. In Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for October 4, 1998. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/981004.html.
18
 
19
20
 
21
Sparck Jones, K., Walker, S. and Robertson, S. A. (1998). Probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and status. Technical Report TR-446, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory.
 
22
Speretta, M. and Gauch, S. (2004). Personalizing search based on user search history. Submitted to CIKM '04. http://www.ittc.ku.edu/keyconcept/
23
 
24
Teevan, J. (2005). The Re:Search Engine: Helping people return to information on the Web. To appear in Proceedings of SIGIR '05 (Doctoral Consortium).
25
 
26
Teevan, J., Dumais, S. T. and Horvitz, E. (2005). Beyond the commons: Investigating the value of personalizing Web search. In Proceedings of the Workshop on New Technologies for Personalized Information Access (PIA).

CITED BY  76

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jaime Teevan: colleagues
Susan T. Dumais: colleagues
Eric Horvitz: colleagues