ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback
Full text PdfPdf (147 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Salvador, Brazil
SESSION: Relevance feedback table of contents
Pages: 43 - 50  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-034-5
Authors
Xuehua Shen  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bin Tan  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ChengXiang Zhai  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 237,   Citation Count: 51
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1076034.1076045
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A major limitation of most existing retrieval models and systems is that the retrieval decision is made based solely on the query and document collection; information about the actual user and search context is largely ignored. In this paper, we study how to exploit implicit feedback information, including previous queries and clickthrough information, to improve retrieval accuracy in an interactive information retrieval setting. We propose several context-sensitive retrieval algorithms based on statistical language models to combine the preceding queries and clicked document summaries with the current query for better ranking of documents. We use the TREC AP data to create a test collection with search context information, and quantitatively evaluate our models using this test set. Experiment results show that using implicit feedback, especially the clicked document summaries, can improve retrieval performance substantially.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
J. Allan and et al. Challenges in information retrieval and language modeling. Workshop at University of Amherst, 2002.
 
3
 
4
W. B. Croft, S. Cronen-Townsend, and V. Larvrenko. Relevance feedback and personalization: A language modeling perspective. In Proeedings of Second DELOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries, 2001.
5
6
7
 
8
C. Huang, L. Chien, and Y. Oyang. Query session based term suggestion for interactive web search. In Proceedings of WWW 2001, 2001.
 
9
10
11
12
13
 
14
J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback information retrieval. In The Smart Retrieval System-Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313--323, Kansas City, MO, 1971. Prentice-Hall.
15
16
17
 
18
R. W. White, J. M. Jose, C. J. van Rijsbergen, and I. Ruthven. A simulated study of implicit feedback models. In Proceedings of ECIR 2004, pages 311--326, 2004.
 
19
C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in the KL-divergence retrieval model. In Proceedings of CIKM 2001, 2001.
20

CITED BY  51

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xuehua Shen: colleagues
Bin Tan: colleagues
ChengXiang Zhai: colleagues