Architecture differencing for self management

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, software models are associated with development and maintenance related activities. This paper demonstrates that models also serve a vital purpose in supporting the self awareness and management of software systems in their deployed environments. We use probes to observe the executing software system by extracting the outside stimuli the system is subjected to. We use this information to concurrently simulate the model-behavior of the software system. The state of the simulating system then mirrors the state of the executing system. In this setting, the simulation serves as a foundation to self awareness through which differences among simulated behavior and real behavior are investigated. The simulation also serves as a guide to self management (i.e., self healing, self configuration) where the system uses additional information provided in the simulating model to manage itself.

REFERENCES

• 1: Balzer, R. and Goldman, N.: "Mediating Connectors: A Non-ByPassable Process Wrapping Technology," Proceedings of the DARPA DISCEX Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, January 2000, pp. 361--368.
• 2: Dohyung, K.: "Java MPEG Player," http://peace.snu.ac.kr/dhkim/java/MPEG/, 1999.
• 3: Alexander Egyed , Robert Balzer, Unfriendly COTS Integration-Instrumentation and Interfaces for Improved Plugability, Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering, p.223, November 26-29, 2001
• 4: Alexander Egyed , Dave Wile, Statechart Simulator for Modeling Architectural Dynamics, Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'01), p.87, August 28-31, 2001 [doi>10.1109/WICSA.2001.948413]
• 5: David Garlan , Robert T. Monroe , David Wile, Acme: architectural description of component-based systems, Foundations of component-based systems, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2000
• 6: David Harel, Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems, Science of Computer Programming, v.8 n.3, p.231-274, June 1, 1987 [doi>10.1016/0167-6423(87)90035-9]
• 7: Jeff Magee , Jeff Kramer, Dynamic structure in software architectures, Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, p.3-14, October 16-18, 1996, San Francisco, California, United States
• 8: Oriezy P. and Taylor R. N.: On the role of software architectures in runtime system reconfiguration. IEE Proceedings -- Software 145(5), 1998, 137--145.
• 9: James Rumbaugh , Ivar Jacobson , Grady Booch, The Unified Modeling Language reference manual, Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 1998
• 10: Wile, D. S. and Egyed, A.: "An Architectural Style for Self Healing Systems," Proceedings of the 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Oslo, Norway, June 2004, pp. 285--290.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING

Keywords:
and reflection, architecture differencing, simulation