|
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we propose an example-based approach to on-line locomotion synthesis. Our approach consists of two parts: motion analysis and motion synthesis. In the motion analysis part, an unlabeled motion sequence is first decomposed into motion segments, exploiting the behavior of the COM (center of mass) trajectory of the performer. Those motion segments are subsequently classified into groups of motion segments such that the same group of motion segments share an identical footstep pattern. Finally, we construct a hierarchical motion transition graph by representing these groups and their connectivity to other groups as nodes and edges, respectively. The coarse level of this graph models locomotive motions and their transitions, and the fine level mainly captures the cyclic nature of locomotive motions. In the motion synthesis part, given a stream of motion specifications in an on-line manner, the motion transition graph is traversed while blending the motion segments to synthesize a motion at a node, one by one, guided by the motion specifications. Our main contributions are the motion labeling scheme and a new motion model, embodied by the hierarchical motion transition graph, which together enable not only artifact-free motion blending but also seamless motion transition.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Sunil Arya , David M. Mount , Nathan S. Netanyahu , Ruth Silverman , Angela Wu, An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching, Proceedings of the fifth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.573-582, January 23-25, 1994, Arlington, Virginia, United States
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Jernej Barbič , Alla Safonova , Jia-Yu Pan , Christos Faloutsos , Jessica K. Hodgins , Nancy S. Pollard, Segmenting motion capture data into distinct behaviors, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Graphics interface, p.185-194, May 17-19, 2004, London, Ontario, Canada
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
{KG04} Kovar L., Gleicher M.: Automated extraction and parameterization motions in large data sets. vol. 23, pp. 559--568.
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
{Per92} Perry J.: Gait analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. Delmar Learning, 1992.
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
 |
26
|
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
{Win90} Winter D. A.: Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1990.
|
CITED BY 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Forsyth , Okan Arikan , Leslie Ikemoto , James O'Brien , Deva Ramanan, Computational studies of human motion: part 1, tracking and motion synthesis, Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision, v.1 n.2, p.77-254, July 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|