ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
From StoCharts to MoDeST: a comparative reliability analysis of train radio communications
Full text PdfPdf (237 KB)
Source Workshop on Software and Performance archive
Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance table of contents
Palma, Illes Balears, Spain
Pages: 13 - 23  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-087-6
Authors
Holger Hermanns  Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
David N. Jansen  Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Yaroslav S. Usenko  Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Sponsors
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1071021.1071023
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

StoCharts have been proposed as a UML statechart extension for performance and dependability evaluation, and have been applied in the context of train radio reliability assessment to show the principal tractability of realistic cases with this approach. In this paper, we extend on this bare feasibility result in two important directions. First, we sketch the cornerstones of a mechanizable translation of StoCharts to MoDeST. The latter is a process algebra-based formalism supported by the MOTOR/MÖBIUS tool tandem. Second, we exploit this translation for a detailed analysis of the train radio case study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C. Baier, B. R. Haverkort, H. Hermanns, and J.-P. Katoen. Model-checking algorithms for continuous-time Markov chains. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(6):524--541, 2003.
 
3
 
4
H. C. Bohnenkamp, H. Hermanns, J.-P. Katoen, and R. Klaren. The Modest modeling tool and its implementation. In P. Kemper and W. H. Sanders, editors, Proc. TOOLS'03, volume 2794 of LNCS, pages 116--133, Berlin, 2003. Springer.
 
5
 
6
 
7
P. R. D'Argenio. Algebras and automata for timed and stochastic systems. PhD thesis, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, November 1999. ISSN 1381--3617.
 
8
 
9
 
10
F. Dehne, H. van de Zandschulp, and R. Wieringa. Toolkit for conceptual modeling (TCM). http://www.cs.utwente.n1/~tcm/.
 
11
 
12
Euroradio FFFIS: class 1 requirements. http://www.aeif.org/db/docs/ccm/SUBSET-052-v200.PDF, 2000.
 
13
Functional requirement specifications: train integrity monitoring system. http://www.aeif.org/db/docs/ccm/EEIG-TIMS-Document.doc, 2000.
 
14
 
15
G. J. Holzmann. The SPIN model checker: primer and reference manual. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2004.
 
16
D. N. Jansen. Extensions of statecharts with probability, time, and stochastic timing. PhD thesis, Universiteit Twente, Inmarks, Bern, October 2003. ISBN 3--9522850--0--5.
 
17
 
18
D. N. Jansen, H. Hermanns, and J.-P. Katoen. A QoS-oriented extension of UML statecharts. In P. Stevens, J. Whittle, and G. Booch, editors, «UML» 2003: the unified modeling language, volume 2863 of LNCS, pages 76--91. Springer, 2003.
 
19
 
20
N. A. Lynch and M. R. Tuttle. An introduction to input/output automata. CWI quarterly, pages 219--246, 1989.
 
21
 
22
 
23
OMG unified modeling language specification. Object Management Group, Needham, MA, version 1.5 edition, March 2003.
 
24
Performance requirements for interoperability. http://www.aeif.org/db/docs/ccm/SUBSET-041_v200.PDF, March 2000.
 
25
 
26
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Holger Hermanns: colleagues
David N. Jansen: colleagues
Yaroslav S. Usenko: colleagues