ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Market equilibria for homothetic, quasi-concave utilities and economies of scale in production
Full text PdfPdf (806 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia
SESSION: Session 1B table of contents
Pages: 63 - 71  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-89871-585-7
Authors
Kamal Jain  One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA
Vijay V. Vazirani  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Yinyu Ye  Management, Science and Engineering, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Eisenberg and Gale (1959) gave a convex program for computing market equilibrium for Fisher's model for linear utility functions, and Eisenberg (1961) generalized this to concave homogeneous functions of degree one. We further generalize to:1. Homothetic, quasi-concave utilities. This also helps extend Eisenberg's result to concave homogeneous functions of arbitrary degree.2. We introduce the notion of a trading cone which enables us to compute market equilibrium in the presence of economies of scale in production provided differential pricing is allowed. Applications to network pricing are provided.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Agarwal, P. A. Chou, and K. Jain, Adaptive Network Coding via Pricing Edges. In preparation.
 
2
K. J. Arrow and G. Debreu, Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy, Econometrica 22 (3), pp. 265--290 (1954).
 
3
R. Ahlswede, N. Cai, S. Y. R. Li, and R. W. Yeung. Network Information Flow. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, IT-46(4):1204--1216, July 2000.
 
4
W. C. Brainard and H. Scarf, How to Compute Equilibrium Prices in 1891. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 1270 (2000).
5
 
6
7
 
8
N. R. Devanur, V. V. Vazirani, An Improved Approximation Scheme for Computing Arrow-Debreu Prices for the Linear Case. FSTTCS 2003, pp. 149--155 (2003).
 
9
E. Eisenberg, and D. Gale, Consensus of Subjective Probabilities: The Pari-Mutuel Method, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 165--168 (1959).
 
10
E. Eisenberg, Aggregation of Utility Functions, Management Sciences, vol(7)4, 337--350, 1961.
 
11
J. W. Friedman, Concavity of Production Functions and Non-Increasing Returns to Scale, Econometrica, vol. 41, no. 5, 981--984, 1973.
 
12
M. Grötschel, L. Lovász, and A. Schrijver. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2nd edition, 1988. 2nd edition 1994.
 
13
D. Gale. The Theory of Linear Economic Models. McGraw Hill, N.Y. (1960).
14
 
15
S. Kapoor, R. Garg and V. Vazirani. An Auction-Based Market Equilibrium Algorithm for the Separable Gross Substitutability Case. In Proc. APPROX, 2004.
 
16
 
17
K. Jain. Market Equilibrium with Production Planning and Linear Utilities in Walras setting. Manuscript 2004.
 
18
K. Jain, M. Mahdian, and A. Saberi, Approximating Market Equilibria, Proc. APPROX 2003.
 
19
 
20
F. P. Kelly. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 8:33--37, 1997.
 
21
O. L. Mangasarian. Nonlinear Programming, McGraw-Hill, 1969.
 
22
J. F. Nash, The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica 28, 1950, pp. 155--162.
 
23
D. J. Newman and M. E. Primak. Complexity of Circumscribed and Inscribed Ellipsoid Methods for Solving Equilibrium Economical Models. Applied Mathematics and Computation 52:223--231 (1992).
 
24
M. Quinzi, Increasing Returns and Efficiency, Oxford University Press, 1992.
 
25
H. Varian, Microeconomic Analysis, New York: W.W. Norton, 1992.
 
26
V. V. Vazirani. Market Equilibrium When Buyers Have Spending Constraints. Submitted, 2003.
 
27
L. Walras. Elements d'economie politique pure; ou, Theorie de la richesse sociale (Elements of Pure Economics; Or the Theory of Social Wealth). Lausanne, Paris, 1874.
 
28
Y. Wu, P. A. Chou, and K. Jain, Practical Network Coding. Allerton Conference 2003.
 
29
Y. Ye, A Path to the Arrow-Debreu Competitive Market Equilibrium. Stanford University working paper 2004. Available online.

CITED BY  10
Collaborative Colleagues:
Kamal Jain: colleagues
Vijay V. Vazirani: colleagues
Yinyu Ye: colleagues