ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A first order logic classifier system
Full text PdfPdf (213 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Learning classifier systems and other genetics-based machine learning table of contents
Pages: 1819 - 1826  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-010-8
Author
Drew Mellor  University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1068009.1068318
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Motivated by the intention to increase the expressive power of learning classifier systems, we developed a new Xcs derivative, Fox-cs, where the classifier and observation languages are a subset of first order logic. We found that Fox-cs was viable at tasks in two relational task domains, poker and blocks world, which cannot be represented easily using traditional bit-string classifiers and inputs. We also found that for these tasks, the level of generality obtained by Fox-cs in the portion of population that produces optimal behaviour is consistent with Wilson's generality hypothesis.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Ahluwalia and L. Bull. A genetic programming-based classi . er system. In Banzhaf et al. {2} , pages 11--18.
 
2
W. Banzhaf, J. Daida, A. E. Eiben, M. H. Garzon, V. Honavar, M. Jakiela, and R. E. Smith, editors. GECCO'99: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
 
3
 
4
 
5
L. B. Booker. Representing attribute-based concepts in a classifier system. In G. J. E. Rawlins, editor, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (FOGA91)pages 115--127, San-Maeto, 1991. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
6
 
7
M. V. Butz and S. W. Wilson. An algorithmic description of XCS. Soft Computing 6(3--4):144--153, 2002.
 
8
 
9
 
10
J. H. Holland. Escaping brittleness:the possibilities of general-purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems. In R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, and T. M. Mitchell, editors, Machine Learning, an Artificial Intelligence Approach pages 593--623, Los Altos, California, 1986. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
11
W. V. Laer. From Propositional to First Order Logic in Machine Learning and Data Mining PhDthesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2002.
 
12
P. L. Lanzi. Extending the representation of classifier conditions, part II: From messy codings to S-expressions. In Banzhaf et al. {2} , pages 345--352.
 
13
 
14
S. Muggleton. Inductive Logic Programming. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) Academic Press, 1992.
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
P. Tadepalli, R. Givan, and K. Driessens, editors. Proceedings of the ICML'04 Workshop on Relational Reinforcement Learning 2004. http://eecs. oregonstate. edu/research/rrl/index. html.
 
21
 
22
S. W. Wilson. Classifier . tness based on accuracy. Evolutionary Computation 3(2):149--175, 1995.
 
23
S. W. Wilson. Generalization in the XCS classifier system. In Genetic Programming 1998: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference pages 665--674, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
24