ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
EA models and population fixed-points versus mutation rates for functions of unitation
Full text PdfPdf (513 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Genetic algorithms table of contents
Pages: 1233 - 1240  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-010-8
Authors
J. Neal Richter  Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
John Paxton  Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
Alden Wright  University of Montana-Missoula Missoula, Montana
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1068009.1068211
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Using a dynamic systems model for the Simple Genetic Algorithm due to Vose[1], we analyze the fixed point behavior of the model without crossover applied to functions of unitation. Unitation functions are simplified fitness functions that reduce the search space into a smaller number of equivalence classes. This reduction allows easier computation of fixed points. We also create a dynamic systems model from a simple nondecreasing EA like the (1+1) EA and variants, then analyze this models on unitation classes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Strogatz, S.H., Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA,1994
 
3
 
4
Rowe, J.: Population fixed-points for functions of unitation. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. Vol. 5. Colin Reeves, and Wolfgang Banzhaf (eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, (1998) 69--84.
 
5
Wright A.H., Rowe J.E., Neil, J.R.: Analysis of the Simple Genetic Algorithm on the Single-peak and Double-peak Landscapes, Proc. of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Fogel et al. Editors, IEEE Press (1999), 214--219.
 
6
Deb, K., Goldberg, D.E.: Analyzing Deception in Trap Functions. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, Vol. 2. D Whitley, editor. Morgan Kaufmann, (1992): 93--108.
 
7
Brin, M., Stuck, G., Introduction to Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York (2002).
 
8
Rudolph, G, Convergence Properties of Evolutionary Algorithms. Verlag Kovac, Hamburg, (1997)
 
9
Droste, S., Jansen, T., Wegener, I., Dynamic parameter control in simple evolutionary algorithms, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, Vol. 6, Worthy Martin and William Spears (eds.) Morgan Kaufmann (2001), pp. 275--294.
 
10
Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth. A.H. Teller and E. Teller, "Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines," J. Chem. Phys. 21 (1953) 1087--1092.
 
11
Mühlenbein, How genetic algorithms really work. I. Mutation and hillclimbing, Proc. PPSN II (Parallel Problem Solving from Nature), (1992), pp. 15--25.
 
12
H. M. Taylor and S. Karlin. An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling, 3th Ed. Academic Press, 1998.
 
13
Kirkpatrick, S., CD Gelatt Jr., MP Vecchi, "Optimization by Simulated Annealing",Science, 220, 4598, 671--680, 1983
 
14


Collaborative Colleagues:
J. Neal Richter: colleagues
John Paxton: colleagues
Alden Wright: colleagues