ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Validation of evolutionary activity metrics for long-term evolutionary dynamics
Full text PdfPdf (180 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Artificial life, evolutionary robotics, and adaptive behavior table of contents
Pages: 137 - 142  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-010-8
Authors
Andrew Stout  University of Massachusetts - Amherst, Amherst, MA
Lee Spector  Hampshire College, Amherst, MA
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1068009.1068028
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As artificial life systems grow in number and sophistication, it is becoming increasingly important that the field agree on principled metrics for evaluating them. This report describes a series of experiments validating the evolutionary activity statistics developed by Bedau and his colleagues [2, 3, 4]. The work described herein was motivated by a feeling that the 'null hypothesis'---that is, that the evolutionary activity statistics fail to exclude intuitively unlifelike systems from Class 3 dynamics [3]---had not been sufficiently disproved in the existing literature. We conducted a series of experiments applying the statistics to such systems, attempting to 'break' the scheme by measuring Class 3 dynamics in an intuitively unlifelike system. The evolutionary activity measurement scheme has so far proved robust to our attempts to break it, but we believe that this work is still valuable in advancing the validity of the scheme, and that this does not mean the scheme is without shortcomings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. C. Avise. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, 2000.
 
2
M. A. Bedau and N. H. Packard. Measurement of evolutionary activity, teleology, and life. In C. Langton, C. Taylor, D. Farmer, and S. Rasmussen, editors, Artificial Life II, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Volume X, pages 431--461, 1992.
 
3
M. A. Bedau, E. Snyder, C. T. Brown, and N. H. Packard. A comparison of evolutionary activity in artificial evolving systems and in the biosphere. In P. Husbands and I. Harvey, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, pages 125--134. MIT Press, 1997.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
S. J. Gould. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Belknap Press, 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Stout: colleagues
Lee Spector: colleagues