Agent-based modelling of product invention

ABSTRACT

This study describes a novel simulation model of the process of product invention. Invention is conceptualized as a process of directed evolutionary adaptation, on a landscape of product design possibilities, by a population of profit-seeking agents (inventors). The simulation experiments examine the sensitivity of the rate of advance in product fitness to the choice of search heuristics employed by inventors. The key finding of the experiments is that if search heuristics are confined to those which are rooted in past experience, or to heuristics which merely generate variety, limited product advance occurs. Notable product fitness advance only occurs when inventor's expectations as to the relative fitness of potential product inventions are incorporated into the model of invention. The results demonstrate the importance of human direction and expectations in invention. They also support the importance of formal product / project evaluation procedures in organizations, and the importance of market information when inventing new products.

REFERENCES

• 1: Abernathy, W. and Clark, K. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction, Research Policy, 14(1):3--22.
• 2: Arifovic, J. (1994). Genetic Algorithm Learning and the Cobweb Model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(1):3--28.
• 3: Ann Maria Bell, Reinforcement Learning Rules in a Repeated Game, Computational Economics, v.18 n.1, p.89-110, August 2001 [doi>10.1023/A:1013818611576]
• 4: Fleming, L. and Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search, Strategic Management Journal, 25(9):909--928.
• 5: Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation (3rd edition), Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• 6: David E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1989
• 7: David E. Goldberg, The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2002
• 8: John H. Holland, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992
• 9: Kauffman, S. and Levin, S. (1987). Towards a General Theory of Adaptive Walks on Rugged Landscapes, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 128:11--45.
• 10: Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• 11: Kauffman, S., Lobo, J. and MacReady, W. (1998). Optimal Search on a Technology Landscape, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper, 98-10-091.
• 12: Klos, T. and Nooteboom, B. (2001). Agent-based computational transactions cost economics, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(3-4):503--526.
• 13: John R. Koza, Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992
• 14: Koza, J., Bennett, F., Andre, D. and Keane, M. (2000). Synthesis of topology and sizing of analog electrical circuits by means of genetic programming, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 186(2-4):459--482.
• 15: John R. Koza, Genetic Programming IV: Routine Human-Competitive Machine Intelligence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2003
• 16: Daniel A. Levinthal, Adaptation on rugged landscapes, Management Science, v.43 n.7, p.934-950, July 1997 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934]
• 17: Maskus, K. and McDaniel, C. (1999). Impacts of the Japanese patent system on productivity growth, Japan and the World Economy, 11(4):557--574.
• 18: Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• 19: Newell, A., Shaw, J. and Simon, H. (1962). The processes of creative thinking, in H.E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking, New York: Atherton Press.
• 20: Noren, K. and Ross, J. (2002). Analog Circuit Design Using Genetic Algorithms, Univ. Idaho working paper.
• 21: Jan W. Rivkin, Imitation of Complex Strategies, Management Science, v.46 n.6, p.824-844, June 2000 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.46.6.824.11940]
• 22: Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, eighth printing, 1968, Harvard Economic Studies, Volume XLVI: Harvard University Press.
• 23: Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, reprinted 1992, London: Routledge.
• 24: Matthew J. Streeter , Martin A. Keane , John R. Koza, Routine Duplication of Post-2000 Patented Inventions by Means of Genetic Programming, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Genetic Programming, p.26-36, April 03-05, 2002
• 25: Windrum, P. and Birchenhall, C. (1998). Is product life cycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary learning, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9(1):109--134.
• 26: Wissmann, L., Yassine, A. and Williams, A. (2004). Towards a Post-Modern Model of Innovation and Evolution, Working Paper, Product Development Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PDL-2004-02, May 2004, http://www.ge.uiuc.edu/pdlab/Publication.htm, (accessed 20 September, 2004).

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.4 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
      Subjects: Economics

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
        I.2.11 Distributed Artificial Intelligence
            Subjects: Multiagent systems
      I.2.6 Learning
          Subjects: Analogies

General Terms:
Algorithms, Economics

Keywords:
inventor's search heuristics, product invention, simulation