ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies
Full text PdfPdf (164 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 12 ,  Issue 2  (June 2005) table of contents
Pages: 149 - 173  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Genevieve Bell  Intel Research, Hillsboro, OR
Mark Blythe  University of York, York, UK
Phoebe Sengers  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 81,   Downloads (12 Months): 535,   Citation Count: 45
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1067860.1067862
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article argues that because the home is so familiar, it is necessary to make it strange, or defamiliarize it, in order to open its design space. Critical approaches to technology design are of both practical and social importance in the home. Home appliances are loaded with cultural associations such as the gendered division of domestic labor that are easy to overlook. Further, homes are not the same everywhere---even within a country. Peoples' aspirations and desires differ greatly across and between cultures. The target of western domestic technology design is often not the user, but the consumer. Web refrigerators that create shopping lists, garbage cans that let advertisers know what is thrown away, cabinets that monitor their contents and order more when supplies are low are central to current images of the wireless, digital home of the future. Drawing from our research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Asia, we provide three different narratives of defamiliarization. A historical reading of American kitchens provides a lens with which to scrutinize new technologies of domesticity, an ethnographic account of an extended social unit in England problematizes taken-for-granted domestic technologies, and a comparative ethnography of the role of information and communication technologies in the daily lives of urban Asia's middle classes reveals the ways in which new technologies can be captured and domesticated in unexpected ways. In the final section of the article, we build on these moments of defamiliarization to suggest a broad set of challenges and strategies for design in the home.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abowd, G., Bobick, A., Essa I., Mynatt, E., and Rogers, W. 2002. The aware home: Developing technologies for successful aging. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop Automation as a Care Giver. Alberta, Canada (July).
 
2
Achenbach, J. 1999. Future perfect: Your house is about to get very smart, ready? Washington Post. (8 Oct. H01).
 
3
 
4
Anderson, B. 1991. Representations and requirements: The value of ethnography in system design. Tech. Rep. EPC-93-117. Rank Xerox EuroPARC.
5
 
6
Beck, U., Gidden, A., and Lash, S. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politic, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
 
7
Bell, G. 2001. Looking across the Atlantic: Using ethnographic methods to make sense of Europe. Intel Tech. J. Q3.
 
8
Bell, G. 2002. ICTs in asia: A cultural account. In Proceedings of Asia Pacific Economics and Business Conference. 479--489.
 
9
Bell, G. and Kaye, J. 2002. Designing technology for domestic spaces: A kitchen manifesto. Gastronomica 2, 2.
10
11
12
 
13
Blythe, M., Monk, A., Overbeeke, K., and Wright, P. (Eds). 2003. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer, Academic Publisher.
 
14
Breckenridge, C. (Ed). 1995. Consuming Modernity: Public Culture in a South Asian World. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
 
15
Braudel Braudel, F. 1981. The Structures of Everyday Life: The Limits of the Possible (S. Reynolds, Trans.): Harper & Row, New York.
 
16
Carlson, A. 2001. Brave new home. Independent Online (31 Oct. 2001; 7 March 2003). Available at http://indyweek.com/durham/2001-10-31/casa3.html.
 
17
Chabaud-Rychter, D. 1995. The configuration of domestic practices in the design of technology. In The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. K. Grint and R. Gill, Eds. London: Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
 
18
Cohen, S. 1972. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. MacGibbon and Kee, London, UK.
 
19
Cowan, R. S. 1983. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books, New York.
 
20
Cowan, R. S. 1997. A Social History of American Technology. Oxford University Press, New York.
 
21
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey Bass Publishers.
 
22
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 
23
24
 
25
Dolinar, L. 1999. The automated home. Newsday (7 March 2003). Available at http://future.newsday.com/3/fsmart7.htm.
 
26
Dunne, A. 1999. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience and Critical Design. RCA Press, London, UK.
 
27
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, Baseil, Switzerland.
28
 
29
Farrer, J. 2002. Opening Up: Youth Sex Culture and Market Reform in Shanghai. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
 
30
Farquahar, J. 2002. Appetites: Food and Sex in Post-Socialist China. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
 
31
Gaver, W. 2001. Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM) News 47 (Oct.). Available at http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/gaver.html.
32
 
33
Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. 2003. Subjective approaches to design for everyday life. Tutorial Notes, Computer Human Interaction 2003.
34
 
35
Gaver, W., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E. 1999. Cultural probes. Interact.: New Visions Hum. Comput. Interact., Vol 1 (Jan. and Feb.).
 
36
Gaver, W., Hooker, B., Dunne, A., and Farrington, P. 2002. The Presence Project. Art Books Intl. Ltd. London, UK.
37
 
38
Geok, L. B. 2001. Census of Population 2000: Economic Characteristics. Statistical Release 3. Singapore Department of Statistics.
 
39
Grint, K. and Gill, R. 1995. The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
 
40
Hardyment, C. 1998. From Mangle to Microwave. Oxford Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
41
 
42
Hine, T. 1986. Populuxe. Kaplan, M., Ed. Knopf, New York.
 
43
Hoggart, R. 1994. Townscape With Figures: Farnham---Portrait of an English Town. Chatto and Windus, London, UK.
 
44
Höök, K., Sengers, P., and Andersson, G. 2003. Sense and sensibility: Evaluation and interactive art. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction 2003. ACM Press, 241--248.
 
45
Horsfield, M. 1998. Biting the Dust: The Joys of Housework. St. Martins Press, New York.
 
46
Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerland, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudoin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderback, B., Lindquist, S., and Sundblad, Y. 2003. Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction 2003, 17--24.
 
47
Jordan, P. W. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
 
48
Kapoor, A. 2004. The digital home: Cooking in the high-tech kitchen. Microsoft Home Magazine (Feb. 22). Available at http://www.microsoft.com/canada/home/style&home/2.3.27_thedigital homecookinginthehightechkitchen.asp.
 
49
Kawakami, K. 1997. 99 More Unuseless Japanese Inventions: The Japanese Art of Chindogu. Harper Collins, New York.
 
50
Kaye, J., Matsakis, N., Gray, M., Wheeler, A., and Hawley, M. 2000. PC dinners, Mr. Java and counter intelligence: Prototyping smart appliances for the kitchen. Unpublished manuscript (Feb. 14, 2000, Mar. 7, 2003). Available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~jofish/writing/information.appliances.pdf.
 
51
Kline, R. 2000. Consumers in the Country: Technology and Social Change in Rural America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
 
52
Kundera, M. 1988. The Art of the Novel. Faber and Faber, London, UK.
 
53
 
54
Lee, R. 2002. Good morning and good evening: A techno-kitchen. Innovation 21, 3, 96--100.
 
55
Lewis. C. S. 1946. That Hideous Strength: A Modern Fairy Tale For Grown Ups. Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc. New York, 286--287.
 
56
Marzano, S. 1996. Vision of the Future. Uitgeverij V + K. Available at http://www.design.philips.com/vof/toc1/home.htm.
 
57
Minor, H. 1956. Body rituals amongst the nacirema, Amer. Anthropol. 58, 3, 503--507.
58
59
60
61
 
62
Norman, D. 1998. The Design of Everyday Things. MIT Press, London, UK.
63
 
64
Oakley, A. 1974. Housewife. Lane, London, UK.
65
 
66
ONS. 2001. Social Trends 31. Office for National Statistics, UK.
 
67
ONS. 2002. Social Trends 32. Office for National Statistics, UK.
 
68
Pinches, M., Ed. 1999. Culture and Privilege in Capitalist Asia. Routledge, London, UK.
 
69
 
70
Raman, M. 1997. Unequal Progress: Malaysia Report. Social Watch. Available at http://www.socwatch.org.uy/en/informeImpreso/pdfs/malaysia1997_eng.pdf.
 
71
Ritzer, G. 1993. The McDonaldization of Society: An Investigation into the Changing Nature of Contemporary Social Life. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
 
72
Robinson, J. and Godfrey, G. 1997. Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
 
73
Robinson, R. and Goodman, D. S. G., Eds. 1996. The New Rich in Asia: Mobile Phones, McDonald's and Middle-class Revolution. Routledge, London, UK.
 
74
Salvador, T., Bell, G., and Anderson, K. 1999. Design ethnography. Design Manag. J. 10, 4, 35--41.
 
75
Scanlon, J. 2001. Power Players. Wired 9, 1.
 
76
Shklovsky, V. 1917. Art as technique. In Contemporary Literary Criticism. Modernism Through Poststructuralism, R. Con Davis, Ed. Longman Press, New York and London, UK.
 
77
Sengers, P. 1999. Practices for machine culture: A case study of integrating artificial intelligence and cultural theory. Surfaces. Vol. VIII.
 
78
Sengers, P. 2003. The engineering of experience. In Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. and Wright. P., Eds. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer, 19--29.
 
79
Shapiro, D. 1995. Noddy's guide to ethnography and HCI. Interfaces Magazine (Spring).
 
80
Silverstone, R. H. E. (Ed). 1992. Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. Routledge, London, UK.
 
81
Singh, Seema. 2003. Wireless internet goes on the road. IEEE Spectrum Online (23 May). Available at http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/resource/sep02/wireless.html.
 
82
Spicer, D. 2000. If you can't stand the coding, stay out of the kitchen: Three chapters in the history of home automation. Doctor Dobb's (online) (March). Available at http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=1493/ddj0003hc/.
 
83
Southwell, M. 1997. Black Stockings and Pot Pourri: Gender Issues in Design and Technology. National Society for Eduction in Art and Design (NSEAD).
 
84
Strasser, S. 1982. Never Done: A History of American Housework. Pantheon Books, New York.
 
85
Strasser, S. 1989. Satisfaction Guaranteed: The Making of the American Mass Market. Pantheon Books, New York.
 
86
Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
 
87
 
88
van, Oost, E. 2003. Materialized gender: How shavers configure the users' femininity and masculinity. In How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 193--208.
89
 
90
Willis, P. 2000. The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press, London, UK.

CITED BY  45


REVIEW

"Joe L. Podolsky : Reviewer"

Homes have always been a focus of technological change, from open fires to stovetops to microwave ovens, and from brooms to robot vacuum cleaners. The changes, however, have come slowly. But, as with all technological applications, changes are now  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Genevieve Bell: colleagues
Mark Blythe: colleagues
Phoebe Sengers: colleagues