ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The TREC robust retrieval track
Full text PdfPdf (592 KB)
Source ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 39 ,  Issue 1  (June 2005) table of contents
COLUMN: TREC Reports table of contents
Pages: 11 - 20  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0163-5840
Author
Ellen M. Voorhees  National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1067268.1067272
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The robust retrieval track explores methods for improving the consistency of retrieval technology by focusing on poorly performing topics. The retrieval task in the track is a traditional ad hoc retrieval task where the evaluation methodology emphasizes a system's least effective topics. The most promising approach to improving poorly performing topics is exploiting text collections other than the target collection such as the web.The track has also investigated appropriate evaluation measures to support the focus on ineffective topics. Traditional measure are dominated by the better-performing topics, and the first two measures used in the track that do emphasize the poorly performing topics are unstable in practice. A third measure, a variant of the traditional MAP measure that uses a geometric mean rather than an arithmetic mean to average individual topic results, shows promise of giving appropriate emphasis to poorly performing topics while being more stable at equal topic set sizes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Giambattista Amati, Claudio Carpineto, and Giovanni Romano. Fondazione Ugo Bordoni at TREC 2004. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference. (TREC 2004), 2005.
2
 
3
Chris Buckley and Donna Harman. Reliable information access final workshop report. ARDA Northeast Regional Research Center Technical Report, 2004.
 
4
K. L. Kwok, L. Grunfeld, H. L. Sun, and P. Deng. TREC2004 robust track experiments using PIRCS. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.
 
5
Shuang Liu, Chaojing Sun, and Clement Yu. UIC at TREC-2004: Robust track. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.
 
6
Christine Piatko, James Mayfield, Paul McNamee, and Scott Cost. JHU/APL at TREC 2004: Robust and terabyte tracks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.
 
7
Vassilis Plachouras, Ben He, and Iadh Ounis. University of Glasgow at TREC2004: Experiments in web, robust and terabyte tracks with Terrier. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.
8
 
9
Ellen M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2003 robust retrieval track. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2003), pages 69--77, 2004.
10
 
11
Jin Xu, Jun Zhao, and Bo Xu. NLPR at TREC 2004: Robust experiments. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.
 
12
Kiduk Yang, Ning Yu, Adam Wead, Gavin La Rowe, Yu-Hsiu Li, Christopher Friend, and Yoon Lee. WIDIT in TREC-2004 genomics, HARD, robust, and web tracks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.
 
13
Elad Yom-Tov, Shai Fine, David Carmel, Adam Darlow, and Einat Amitay. Juru at TREC 2004: Experiments with prediction of query difficulty. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), 2005.