Confirming the influence of educational background in pair-design knowledge through experiments

ABSTRACT

The sharing of tacit knowledge is a strategic factor for the success of software process, from a number of perspectives: training, project assimilation, and reducing noise in knowledge transfer. Pair programming is supposed to be a practice suitable for this purpose. Unfortunately, the building of tacit knowledge is determined by factors that are difficult to isolate and capture because they concern personal attitude and capability. Thus, we have focused on the possible causes forming the individual ability, that can be isolated and studied, such as the individual education background. We have applied the practice of working in pairs to the design phase. We have made an experiment and a replica in academic environment, in order to understand the relationship between the building of knowledge through the practice and the individual background. In this paper we discuss the replica and compare the results with the first experiment's ones.

REFERENCES

• 1: Victor R. Basili , Forrest Shull , Filippo Lanubile, Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.25 n.4, p.456-473, July 1999 [doi>10.1109/32.799939]
• 2: Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 3: Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.), Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 4: Working in Pairs as a Means for Design Knowledge Building: An Empirical Study, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, p.62, June 24-26, 2004
• 5: Gerardo Canfora , Aniello Cimitile , Corrado Aaron Visaggio, Lessons learned about distributed pair programming: what are the knowledge needs to address?, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, p.314, June 09-11, 2003
• 6: Carver, J., Jaccheri, L., Morasca, S., and Shull, F., Using Empirical Studies during Software Courses. Experimental Software Engineering Research Network 2001-2003. LNCS 2765, 2003.
• 7: Cockburn, A., Characterizing People as Non-Linear, First-Order Components in Software Development. In Proceedings of 4th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, 2000.
• 8: Foresythe, G., B., Hedlund, J., Snook, S., Horvath, J., A., Williams, W. M., Bullis, R. C., Dennis, M. and Sternberg, R., Construct validation of tacit Knowledge for military Leadership, Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, 1998.
• 9: Höst, M., Regnell, B., and Wholin, C., Using Students as Subjects - A comparative Study of Students & Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment. In Proceedings of 4th Conference on Empirical Assessment & Evaluation in Software Engineering (EASE), 2000.
• 10: Barbara A. Kitchenham , Shari Lawrence Pfleeger , Lesley M. Pickard , Peter W. Jones , David C. Hoaglin , Khaled El Emam , Jarrett Rosenberg, Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.28 n.8, p.721-734, August 2002 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2002.1027796]
• 11: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather Bullock , Julian Fernald, The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course, Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 27-March 03, 2002, Cincinnati, Kentucky
• 12: Grigori Melnik , Frank Maurer, Direct Verbal Communication as a Catalyst of Agile Knowledge Sharing, Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference (ADC'04), p.21-31, June 22-26, 2004
• 13: Nawrocki, J. and Wojciechowski, A. Experimental Evaluation of Pair Programming. In Proceedings of European Software Control and Metrics, 2001.
• 14: Tammy VanDeGrift, Coupling pair programming and writing: learning about students' perceptions and processes, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 15: Laurie Williams , Bob Kessler, The Effects of "Pair-Pressure" and "Pair-Learning" on Software Engineering Education, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training, p.59, March 06-08, 2000
• 16: Laurie Williams , Robert R. Kessler , Ward Cunningham , Ron Jeffries, Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming, IEEE Software, v.17 n.4, p.19-25, July 2000 [doi>10.1109/52.854064]
• 17: Laurie Williams , Richard L. Upchurch, In support of student pair-programming, Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education, p.327-331, February 2001, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
• 18: Laurie Ann Williams , Robert R. Kessler, The collaborative software process(sm), 2000
• 19: Laurie Williams , Anuja Shukla , Annie I. Anton, An Initial Exploration of the Relationship Between Pair Programming and Brooks' Law, Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference (ADC'04), p.11-20, June 22-26, 2004

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management

Keywords:
agile development, knowledge management, pair programming