Compensating creativity in the digital world: reconciling technology and culture

ABSTRACT

New proposals on compensatory mechanisms and viability of traditional practices for online environment is currently being considered by the European Union and are subject of heated academic debate. Simultaneously new business models for distribution of intellectual property online are emerging rapidly. The paper focuses on the failures of the current compensatory mechanisms, as well as new proposals to compensate the creative in the online environment, including current online distribution practices, universal levy proposals -- Internet access and traffic levies, blank media levies, voluntary compensation systems, as well as traditional practices of the collecting societies, effects of the content protection technologies (DRM) on the accessibility and fair use of information online. The paper suggests the set of features for the new compensatory system, including socio-economic aspects of the different societies, and the need of uniform and worldwide compensatory system. Conclusions support the necessity to revise current compensatory mechanisms, centering on the proposed features, rather than just technological mechanisms, which dominate the current political agenda.

REFERENCES

• 1: Drahos, Peter (1996). A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited.
• 2: Fisher, William W. (2004). Promises to Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.
• 3: Kiškis, Mindaugas, Vytautas Mizaras (2003). Autoriu teisiu ir gretutiniu teisiu apribojimo, susijusio su kuriniu atgaminimu asmeniniais tikslais, kompensavimo mechanizmo igyvendinimo pasekmiu tyrimas (Review of consequences of restriction of copyright due to private copying). European Committee under the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, 2003.
• 4: Hugenholtz, P. B., L.M.C.R. Guibault & S. M. van Geffen. The Future of Levies in a Digital Environment, March 2003, <<u>http://www.ivir.nl/publications/intellectual_property.html</u>.
• 5: Katz, Ariel (2003). The Potential Demise of another Natural Monopoly: The Present and the Future of Collective Administration of Copyrights, <u>http://www.innovationlaw.org/Bell Labs/pages/Pote ntial Demise.pdf</u>.
• 6: Lessig, Lawrence (2002). The Future of Ideas. New York, Vintage Books, A Division of Random House.
• 7: Fetscherin, M.; Vlietstra, C. (2005): Digital music: Key factors determining the download price. In: E-Business Review, Volume V (forthcoming). <u>http://indicare.berlecon.de/tiki_read article.php?articleId=50</u>
• 8: Katz, Ariel (2003). The Potential Demise of another Natural Monopoly: The Present and the Future of Collective Administration of Copyrights, <u>http://www.innovationlaw.org/Bell Labs/pages/Potential Demise.pdf</u>.
• 9: Lincoff, Bennett (November 22, 2002), A Full, Fair and Feasible Solution to the Dilemma of Online Music Licensing, <u>http://www.quicktopic.com/boing/D/uhAMNwVb8yfkc.html</u>.
• 10: Fetscherin, M.; Vlietstra, C. (2005): Digital music: Key factors determining the download price. In: E-Business Review, Volume V (forthcoming). <u>http://indicare.berlecon.de/tiki-read article.php?articleId=50</u>.
• 11: The Berlin Declaration, <u>http://www.wizards-of-os.org/index.php?id=931&L=3<</u>.
• 12: <u>http://wwww.creativecommons.org</u>
• 13: Worlock, Kate (2004). The pros and cons of Open Access. Nature Web Focus: Access to the Literature: the Dabate Continnues. <u>http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html</u>
• 14: Oberholzer, Felix, Strumpf, Koleman (2004). The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Anglysis. <u>http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing March2004.pdf</u>
• 15: Lau, Eric Kin Wai (2003). An empirical study of software piracy. Business Ethics: A European Review 12(3), 233--245.
• 16: Babachinaite, Genovaite, Aurelijus Gutauskas, Gitana Jurgelaitiene, Mindaugas Kišlkis, Saulius Starkus (2003). Nusikalstamumo ir kitu; nepageidautiu socialiniu procesu prevencijos problemos bei ju sprendimas Europos valstybese (Prevention of Crime and Other Negative Social Phenomena in European Countries). Vilnius, Law University of Lithuania.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
DRM, alternative compensation systems, creativity, intellectual property, levies