|
ABSTRACT
Existing energy-efficient approaches to in-network aggregation in sensor networks can be classified into two categories, tree-based and multi-path-based, with each having unique strengths and weaknesses. In this paper, we introduce Tributary-Delta, a novel approach that combines the advantages of the tree and multi-path approaches by running them simultaneously in different regions of the network. We present schemes for adjusting the regions in response to changes in network conditions, and show how many useful aggregates can be readily computed within this new framework. We then show how a difficult aggregate for this context---finding frequent items---can be efficiently computed within the framework. To this end, we devise the first algorithm for frequent items (and for quantiles) that provably minimizes the worst case total communication for non-regular trees. In addition, we give a multi-path algorithm for frequent items that is considerably more accurate than previous approaches. These algorithms form the basis for our efficient Tributary-Delta frequent items algorithm. Through extensive simulation with real-world and synthetic data, we show the significant advantages of our techniques. For example, in computing Count under realistic loss rates, our techniques reduce answer error by up to a factor of 3 compared to any previous technique.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Atmel AVR Microcontroller Datasheet. http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod-documents/2467s.pdf.
|
 |
2
|
Brian Babcock , Shivnath Babu , Mayur Datar , Rajeev Motwani , Jennifer Widom, Models and issues in data stream systems, Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, June 03-05, 2002, Madison, Wisconsin
[doi> 10.1145/543613.543615]
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
A. Deshpande, C. Guestrin, S. Madden, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In VLDB, 2004.
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Intel Lab Data. http://berkeley.intel-research.net/labdata/.
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
A. Manjhi, S. Nath, and P. B. Gibbons. Tributaries and deltas: Efficient and robust aggregation in sensor network streams. Technical Report IRP-TR-05-01, Intel Research Pittsburgh, PA, March 2005.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
G. Manku and R. Motwani. Approximate frequency counts over data streams. In VLDB, 2002.
|
| |
15
|
S. Muthukrishnan. Data streams: Algorithms and applications. Technical report, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 2003.
|
 |
16
|
Suman Nath , Phillip B. Gibbons , Srinivasan Seshan , Zachary R. Anderson, Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031525]
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Victor Shnayder , Mark Hempstead , Bor-rong Chen , Geoff Werner Allen , Matt Welsh, Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031518]
|
 |
19
|
Nisheeth Shrivastava , Chiranjeeb Buragohain , Divyakant Agrawal , Subhash Suri, Medians and beyond: new aggregation techniques for sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031524]
|
 |
20
|
Gyula Simon , Miklós Maróti , Ákos Lédeczi , György Balogh , Branislav Kusy , András Nádas , Gábor Pap , János Sallai , Ken Frampton, Sensor network-based countersniper system, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031497]
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. Query processing in sensor networks. In CIDR, 2003.
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
J. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Computing aggregates for monitoring wireless sensor networks. In SPNA, 2003.
|
CITED BY 29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Majid Sarrafzadeh , Foad Dabiri , Roozbeh Jafari , Tammara Massey , Ani Nahapetan, Low power light-weight embedded systems, Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design, October 04-06, 2006, Tegernsee, Bavaria, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wenwei Xue , Qiong Luo , Lei Chen , Yunhao Liu, Contour map matching for event detection in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, June 27-29, 2006, Chicago, IL, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Silberstein , Gavino Puggioni , Alan Gelfand , Kamesh Munagala , Jun Yang, Suppression and failures in sensor networks: a Bayesian approach, Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, September 23-27, 2007, Vienna, Austria
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jie Gao , Leonidas Guibas , Nikola Milosavljevic , John Hershberger, Sparse data aggregation in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, April 25-27, 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goce Trajcevski , Oliviu Ghica , Peter Scheuermann , Roberto Tamassia , Isabel F. Cruz, Alternating multiple tributaries + deltas, Proceedings of the 5th workshop on Data management for sensor networks, August 24-24, 2008, Auckland, New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. Le-Trung , A. Taherkordi , T. Skeie , H. N. Pham , P. E. Engelstad, Information storage, reduction and dissemination in sensor networks: a survey, Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Conference on Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, p.1111-1116, January 11-13, 2009, Las Vegas, NV, USA
|
|