ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Contact networking: a localized mobility system
Full text PdfPdf (233 KB)
Source International Conference On Mobile Systems, Applications And Services archive
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Mobile systems, applications and services table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages: 145 - 158  
Year of Publication: 2003
Authors
Casey Carter  UIUC
Robin Kravets  UIUC
Jean Tourrilhes  Hewlett Packard Labs
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1066116.1066119
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

MobileIP, the standard for Internet mobility, enables transparent mobility for a mobile node, but requires communication to take a multihop path through the node's Home Agent. Although a user with a multiple-interface mobile node may desire the ability to communicate locally, perhaps while disconnected from the Internet, MobileIP offers no such support.Contact Networking provides lightweight, localized network communication to a node with diverse network interfaces. The goal is to provide support for local connectivity equivalent to that provided by MobileIP for remote connectivity. The concept of link-layer awareness enables Contact Networking to tailor its operation to different links, using link-layer native services to implement abstract services when possible. Interface management and autoconfiguration insulate the user from concerns about the number and type of interfaces available.In this paper, we motivate the need for localized mobility, and present the design and architecture of Contact Networking. Details of our prototype implementation illustrate the complexities of providing a localized mobility facility.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AppleTalk Network System Overview. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1990.
2
 
3
C. Brown and A. Malis. Multiprotocol interconnect over frame relay. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 2427, Internet Engineering Task Force, September 1998.
 
4
S. Cheshire, B. Aboba, and E. Guttman. Dynamic configuration of IPv4 link-local addresses. Internet Draft (Work in Progress) draft - ietf - zeroconf - ipv4 - linklocal - 07.txt, Internet Engineering Task Force, August 2002.
 
5
R. Cole, D. Shur, and C. Villamizar. IP over ATM: A framework document. Request for Comments (Informational) RFC 1932, Internet Engineering Task Force, April 1996.
 
6
A. Conta and S. Deering. IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration. Request for Comments (Draft Standard) RFC 2462, Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
 
7
R. Droms. Dynamic host configuration protocol. Request for Comments (Draft Standard) RFC 2131, Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1997.
 
8
L. Esibov, B. Aboba, and D. Thaler. Linklocal multicast name resolution (LLMNR). Internet Draft (Work in Progress) draft- ietf - dnsext - mdns - 12. txt, Internet Engineering Task Force, August 2002.
 
9
R. Hinden and S. Deering. Ip version 6 addressing architecture. Request for Comments (Standards Track) RFC 2373, Internet Engineering Task Force, July 1998.
 
10
C. Hornig. Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernet networks. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 894, Internet Engineering Task Force, April 1984.
11
12
 
13
IEEE Computer Society. 802.11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications, June 1997.
14
 
15
D. Katz. Transmission of IP and ARP over FDDI networks. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 1390, Internet Engineering Task Force, January 1993.
 
16
 
17
P. J. Megowan, D. W. Susak, and C. D. Knutson. IrDA infrared communications: An overview. http://www.irda.org.
 
18
T. Narten, E. Nordmark, and W. Simpson. Neighbor discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6). Request for Comments (Standards Track) RFC 2461, Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998.
 
19
NetBIOS Working Group. Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP transport: Concepts and methods. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 1001, Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1987.
20
 
21
C. Perkins. IP mobility support for IPv4. Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) RFC 3344, Internet Engineering Task Force, August 2002.
 
22
C. E. Perkins, J. T. Malinen, R. Wakikawa, and E. M. Belding-Royer. IP address autoconfiguration for ad hoc networks. Internet Draft (Work in Progress) draft-perkins-manetautoconf-01.txt, Internet Engineering Task Force, November 2001.
 
23
D. Piscitello and J. Lawrence. Transmission of IP datagrams over the SMDS service. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 1209, Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1991.
 
24
D. Plummer. Ethernet address resolution protocol: Or converting network protocol addresses to 48.bit Ethernet address for transmission on Ethernet hardware. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 826, Internet Engineering Task Force, November 1982.
 
25
D. Provan. Transmitting IP traffic over ARCNET networks. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 1201, Internet Engineering Task Force, February 1991.
 
26
J. Renwick. IP over HIPPI. Request for Comments (Draft Standard) RFC 2067, Internet Engineering Task Force, January 1997.
 
27
J. Romkey. Nonstandard for transmission of IP datagrams over serial lines: SLIP. Request for Comments (Standard) RFC 1055, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1988.
 
28
rtnetlink, NETLINK_ROUTE - Linux IPv4 routing socket Linux Man Page rtnetlink(7), April 1999.
 
29
K. Sklower, B. Lloyd, G. McGregor, D. Carr, and T. Coradetti. The PPP multilink protocol (MP). Request for Comments (Draft Standard) RFC 1990, Internet Engineering Task Force, 1996.
30
 
31
 
32
J. Tourrilhes and C. Carter. P-Handoff: A protocol for fine grained peer-to-peer vertical handoff. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC'02), 2002.
 
33
J. Tourrilhes, L. Magalhães, and C. Carter. On-demand TCP: Transparent peer-to-peer TCP/IP over IrDA. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '02), 2002.
 
34
J. Veizades, E. Guttman, C. Perkins, and S. Kaplan. Service location protocol. Request for Comments (Standards Track) RFC 2165, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1997.
35

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Casey Carter: colleagues
Robin Kravets: colleagues
Jean Tourrilhes: colleagues