ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Temperature-aware resource allocation and binding in high-level synthesis
Full text PdfPdf (237 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 42nd annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, California, USA
SESSION: Physical considerations in high-level synthesis table of contents
Pages: 196 - 201  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-058-2
Authors
Rajarshi Mukherjee  Northwestern University, IL
Seda Ogrenci Memik  Northwestern University, IL
Gokhan Memik  Northwestern University, IL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 90,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065579.1065633
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Physical phenomena such as temperature have an increasingly important role in performance and reliability of modern process technologies. This trend will only strengthen with future generations. Attempts to minimize the design effort required for reaching closure in reliability and performance constraints are agreeing on the fact that higher levels of design abstractions need to be made aware of lower level physical phenomena. In this paper, we investigated techniques to incorporate temperature-awareness into high-level synthesis. Specifically, we developed two temperature-aware resource allocation and binding algorithms that aim to minimize the maximum temperature that can be reached by a resource in a design. Such a control scheme will have an impact on the prevention of hot spots, which in turn is one of the major hurdles in front of reliability for future integrated circuits. Our algorithms are able to reduce the maximum attained temperature by any module in a design by up to 19.6°C compared to a binding that optimizes switching power.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Cao, L., et al., Transient Thermal Management of Portable Electronics using Heat Storage and Dynamic Power Dissipation Control. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology-Part A, 1998. 21(1): p. 113--123.
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Gunther, S., et al., Managing the Impact of Increasing Microprocessor Power Consumption. Intel Technology Journal, 2001.
10
11
 
12
Intel Corp. Intel® Itanium® Processor Overview, www.intel.com/design/itanium/itanium/
 
13
Krum, A., Thermal Management, in The CRC Handbook of Thermal Engineering, F. Kreith, Editor. 2000, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Sabry, M.N. Dynamic Compact Thermal Models: An Overview of Current and Potential Advances. International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems. 2002.
 
19
 
20
Skadron, K., et al. Temperature-aware Microarchitecture. International Symposium on Computer Architecture. 2004.
 
21
Stanford University Compiler Group The SUIF 2 Compiler System, http://suif.stanford.edu/suif/suif2/
22

CITED BY  13

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rajarshi Mukherjee: colleagues
Seda Ogrenci Memik: colleagues
Gokhan Memik: colleagues