ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
ESL: building the bridge between systems to silicon
Full text PdfPdf (152 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 42nd annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, California, USA
PANEL SESSION: ESL: tales from the trenches table of contents
Pages: 69 - 70  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-058-2
Authors
Francine Bacchini  Thinkbold Corporate Communications, San Jose, CA
David Maliniak  Electronic Design, Paramus, NJ
Terry Doherty  Emulex, Bothell, WA
Peter McShane  Northrop Grumman, Redondo Beach, California
Suhas A. Pai  Qualcomm, San Diego, CA
Sriram Sundararajan  Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, TX
Soo-Kwan Eo  ST Microelectronics, SEOUL, Korea
Pascal Urard  ST Microelectronics, The Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065579.1065602
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Electronic System-Level design has arrived - but can ESL provide the bridge from systems to silicon? Comprised of real world designers, this DAC ESL panel will examine and debate what works, what doesn't, and what the gaps are in the methodology and tool offerings. Panelists from a variety of industry segments, including Military/aerospace, storage area networks (SAN), wireless communications and consumer electronics, will share their experiences, lessons learned and further needs.Does ESL bridge the gap between systems to silicon? Hear from designers about their real world experience with ESL. What worked according to expectations? What didn't? What are the gaps in the methodology and tool offerings that need to be filled, and why?This panel of ESL design methodology users will give us a "reality check" that will enable potential users to make an adoption decision, and enable ESL design tool suppliers to evaluate their product strategies against "big picture" requirements.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Francine Bacchini: colleagues
David Maliniak: colleagues
Terry Doherty: colleagues
Peter McShane: colleagues
Suhas A. Pai: colleagues
Sriram Sundararajan: colleagues
Soo-Kwan Eo: colleagues
Pascal Urard: colleagues