ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Integrating digital libraries and electronic publishing in the DART project
Full text PdfPdf (310 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Denver, CO, USA
SESSION: Digital libraries and cyberinfastructure track: use of digital libraries in the humanities table of contents
Pages: 114 - 120  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-876-8
Authors
Gordon Dahlquist  Columbia University
Brian Hoffman  Columbia University
David Millman  Columbia University
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065385.1065411
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Digital Anthropology Resources for Teaching (DART) project integrates the content acquisition and cataloging initiatives of a federated digital repository with the development of scholarly publications and the creation of digital tools to facilitate classroom teaching. The project's technical architecture and unique publishing model create a teaching context where students move easily between primary and secondary source material and between authored environments and independent research, and raise specific issues with regard to metadata, object referral, rights, and exporting content. The model also addresses the loss of provenance and catalog information for digital objects embedded in "born-digital" publications. The DART project presents a practical methodology to combine repository and publication that is both exportable and discipline-neutral.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
DSpace Project. http://www.dspace.org/
 
2
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://www.dublincore.org/
 
3
Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/
 
4
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records. Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records: final report. K.G.Saur, München, 1994. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf
 
5
Fedora Project: An Open-Source Digital Repository Management System. http://www.fedora.info/
 
6
IMS Content Packaging. http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/
 
7
JSR-000170 Content Repository for Java Technology API. http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr170/
 
8
Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS). Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/
 
9
Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). http://www.openarchives.org/
 
10
The Open Digital Rights Language Initiative (ODRL). http://odrl.net/
 
11
Organisation Internationale De Normalisation ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 Coding Of Moving Pictures And Audio. MPEG-21 Digital Item Declaration Language (DIDL). http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-21/mpeg-21.htm
 
12
Rights MEtadata for Open archiving (Project RoMEO). http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/
 
13
Sakai Project. http://www.sakaiproject.org/
 
14
Shibboleth Project. http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/
 
15
Flecker, D. and McLean, N. eds. Digital Library Content and Course Management Systems: Issues of Interoperation: Report of a Study Group. July, 2004. http://www.diglib.org/pubs/cmsdl0407/
 
16
McLean, N. and Lynch, C. Interoperability between Library Information Services and Learning Environments -- Bridging the Gaps: A Joint White Paper on behalf of the IMS Global Learning Consortium and the Coalition for Networked Information. May, 2004. http://www.imsglobal.org/digitalrepositories/CNIandIMS_2004.pdf
 
17
Tillett, B. What is FRBR?: A Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic University. Library of Congress Catalog Distribution Service, Washington, DC, 2003. http://www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html
 
18
Van de Sompel, H. and Lagoze, C. The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative. D-Lib Magazine. 6(2), 2000.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gordon Dahlquist: colleagues
Brian Hoffman: colleagues
David Millman: colleagues