ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Assessing tools for use with webcasts
Full text PdfPdf (287 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Denver, CO, USA
SESSION: Users and interaction track: interacting in media table of contents
Pages: 79 - 88  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-876-8
Authors
Elaine G. Toms  Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Christine Dufour  Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Jonathan Lewis  Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Ron Baecker  University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065385.1065403
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This research assessed the effectiveness of selected interface tools in helping people respond to classic information tasks with webcasts. Rather than focus on a classic search/browse task to locate an appropriate webcast to view, our work takes place at the level of an individual webcast to assess interactivity within the contents of a single webcast. The questions guiding our work are: 1) Which tool(s) are the most effective in achieving the best response? 2) How do users use those tools for task completion? In this study, 16 participants responded to a standard set of information tasks using ePresence, a webcasting system that handles both live and stored video, and provides multiple techniques for accessing content. Using questionnaires, screen capture and interviews, we evaluated the interaction, assessed the tools, and based on our results, make suggestions for improving access to the content of stored webcasts.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
5
 
6
Geisler, G. et al. Interface concepts for the open video project. In Proceedings of the 64th ASIST Annual Meeting (ASIST2001) (Washington, DC, USA, November 3-8, 2001). Information Today Inc., Medford, 2001, 58--75.
7
8
 
9
Lee, H. & Smeaton, A. Designing the user interface for the Fííschlár Digital Video Library. Journal of Digital Information, 2, 4 (2002). http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v02/i04/Lee/
 
10
Li, F. et al. Browsing digital video. CHI Letters: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2, 1 (2000), 169--176.
11
 
12
Rowe, L.A., Harley, D., and Pletcher P. BIBS: a lecture webcasting system. (2001) http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/ research/ publications/2001/160/bibs-report.pdf
 
13
Slaughter, L., Marchionini, G. and Geisler, G. Open Video: a framework for a test collection. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23, 3 (2000), 219--245.
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Webopedia. http://isp.webopedia.com/TERM/W/Webcast.htm
19
 
20
 
21
Yang, M. et al. Measuring user performance during interactions with digital video. In Proceedings of 66th ASIST Annual Meeting (ASIST2003) (Long Beach, CA, USA, October 19-22, 2003). Information Today Inc., Medford, 2003, 221--230.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Elaine G. Toms: colleagues
Christine Dufour: colleagues
Jonathan Lewis: colleagues
Ron Baecker: colleagues