Information synthesis: a new approach to explore secondary information in scientific literature

ABSTRACT

Advances in both technology and publishing practices continue to increase the quantity of scientific literature that is available electronically. In this paper, we introduce the Information Synthesis process, a new approach that enables scientists to visualize, explore, and resolve contradictory findings that are inevitable when multiple empirical studies explore the same natural phenomena. Central to the Information Synthesis approach is a cyber-infrastructure that provides a scientist with both primary and secondary information from an article and structured information resources. To demonstrate this approach, we have developed the Multi-User, Information Extraction for Information Synthesis (METIS) System. METIS is an interactive system that automates critical tasks within the Information Synthesis process. We provide two case-studies that demonstrate the utility of the Information Synthesis approach.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alderson, P., Green, S. and Higgins, J.P.T. (eds.). Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 {Updated March 2004}. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2004.
• 2: Allen, E. and Olkin, I. Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282 (7). 634--635, 1999.
• 3: Atkinson, D.R., Furlong, M.J. and Wampold, B.E. Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations and the scientific process: Is there a statistically significant relationship? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29. 189--194, 1982.
• 4: Begg, C. and Berlin, J. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (151). 419--463, 1988.
• 5: Catherine Lesley Blake , Dennis F. Kibler , Wanda Pratt, Information synthesis: a mixed-initiative meta-analytic approach to facilitate knowledge discovery from scientific text, 2003
• 6: Centers for Disease Control. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 2002.
• 7: Davies, H.T.O. and Crombie, I.K. What is a Meta-Analysis? Hayward Medical Communications, 1 (8). 1--8, 1998.
• 8: Davies, H.T.O. and Crombie, I.K. What is a Systematic Review? Hayward Medical Communications, 1 (5). 1--5, 1998.
• 9: Davis, S., Mirick, D.K. and Stevens, R.G. Residential Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Breast Cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155 (5). 446--454, 2002.
• 10: DerSimonian, R. and Laird, N. Meta-Analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7. 177--188, 1986.
• 11: Easterbrook, P.J., Berlin, J.A., Gopalan, R. and Matthews, D.R. Publication bias in research. Lancet, 337. 867--872, 1991.
• 12: Ellison, R.C., Zhang, Y., McLennan, C.E. and Rothman, K.J. Exploring the Relation of Alcohol Consumption to Risk of Breast Cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154 (8). 740--747, 2001.
• 13: Hunter, J.E. and Schmidt, F.L. Methods of Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.
• 14: Khuder, S.A., Mutgi, A.B. and Nugent, S. Smoking and breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Rev Environ Health, 16 (4). 253--261, 2001.
• 15: Light, K. The Cochrane Library - Self Training Guide and Notes 2003 Issue 4. Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2003.
• 16: Lipsey, M.W. and Wilson, D.B. Practical Meta-Analysis. Sage, 2000.
• 17: Longnecker, M.P., Berlin, J.A., Orza, M.J. and Chalmers, T.C. A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA, 260 (5). 652--656, 1988.
• 18: National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment. The Health Technology Assessment Programme Information Sheet 1: An overview of the programme , Version 1.0, Southhampton, UK, 2003.
• 19: National Library of Medicine. UMLS Metathesaurus Fact Sheet Fact Sheet, National Library of Medicine, 2004.
• 20: Petrosino, A. Lead Authors of Cochrane Reviews: Survey Results. Report to the Campbell Collaboration, University of Pennsylvania, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
• 21: Singletary, K.W. and Gapstur, S.M. Alcohol and breast cancer: review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence and potential mechanisms. JAMA, 286 (17). 2143--2151, 2001.
• 22: Sutton, A.J., Abrams, K.R., Jones, D.R., Sheldon, T.A. and Song, F. (eds.). Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. York Publishing Services, York, UK, 1998.
• 23: Tengs, T. and Osgood, N.D. The Link between Smoking and Impotence : Two Decades of Evidence. Preventive Medicine, 32 (6). 447--452, 2001.
• 24: Thornton, A. and Lee, P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53. 207--216, 2000.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.1 Content Analysis and Indexing
          Subjects: Linguistic processing

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval
          Subjects: Information filtering
      H.3.7 Digital Libraries
          Subjects: Dissemination

  J. Computer Applications
  J.3 LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
      Subjects: Medical information systems

General Terms:
Documentation, Experimentation

Keywords:
document summarization, information extraction, information retrieval, information synthesis, text mining