ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
You can lead a horse to water: teacher development and use of digital library resources
Full text PdfPdf (790 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Denver, CO, USA
SESSION: Digital libraries and cyberinfastructure track: use of digital libraries in education table of contents
Pages: 1 - 8  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-876-8
Authors
Mimi Recker  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Jim Dorward  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Deonne Dawson  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Sam Halioris  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Ye Liu  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Xin Mao  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Bart Palmer  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Jaeyang Park  Utah State University, Logan, UT
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065385.1065387
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article presents findings from approximately 150 users who created instructional projects using educational digital library resources. One hundred of these users were teachers participating in professional development workshops on the topic of digital libraries. Our iterative approach to tool and workshop development and implementation was based on a framework that characterizes several input, output, and process variables affecting dissemination of such technologies in educational contexts. Data sources involved a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, including electronic surveys, interviews, participant observations, and server log file and artifact analyses. These multiple and complementary levels of analyses reveal that despite teachers reporting great value in learning resources and educational digital libraries, significant and lasting impact on teaching practice remains difficult to obtain.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Becker, H. Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (2000).
 
2
Borgman, C.L., Gilliland-Swetland, A.J., Leazer, G.H., Mayer, R., Gwynn, D. and Gazan, R. Evaluating Digital Libraries for Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Education: A Case Study of the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype (ADEPT). Library Trends, 49 (2000). 228--250.
 
3
Borgman, D., Krieger, D., Gallagher, A. and Bower, J. Children's use of an interactive science library: Exploratory research. School Library Media Quarterly, 18 (1990). 108--113.
4
 
5
Cradler, J. and Cradler, R. Prior Studies for Technology Insertion, Far West Laboratory, San Francisco, CA, 1995.
 
6
Cuban, L. Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. Teachers College Press, New York, 1986.
 
7
DCMI. DCMI Education Working Group, 2002.
8
 
9
Greenwood, D. and Levin, M. Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.
10
11
 
12
Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. and Soloway, E. Enacting project based science. Elementary School Journal, 97 (1997). 341--358.
 
13
Means, B. and Olson, K. Technology and education reform, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 1997.
14
 
15
 
16
NSDL. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, 2003.
 
17
Patton, M. Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15 (1994). 311--319.
 
18
Putnam, R. and Borko, H. What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29 (2000). 4--15.
 
19
Recker, M., Dorward, J. and Nelson, L. Discovery and use of online learning resources: case study findings. Educational Technology & Society, 7 (2004).
20
21
 
22
23
 
24
Swaim, M. and Swaim, S. Teacher time (or rather, the lack of it). American Educator, 23 (1999). 20--26.
 
25
Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., S and Soloway, E. Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 (2000). 75--104.
 
26
Wattenberg, F. A National Digital Library for Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education, D-Lib Magazine, 1998.
 
27
WCAG. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, 1999.
 
28
Weiss, C. Evaluation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995.
 
29
Zhao, Y. and Frank, K. Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40 (2003). 807--840.
 
30
Zia, L. Growing a national learning environments and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education: Current Issues and Opportunities for the NSDL Program, D-Lib Magazine, 2001.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mimi Recker: colleagues
Jim Dorward: colleagues
Deonne Dawson: colleagues
Sam Halioris: colleagues
Ye Liu: colleagues
Xin Mao: colleagues
Bart Palmer: colleagues
Jaeyang Park: colleagues