Composing security policies with polymer

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Composing security policies with polymer

Full text

Pdf (155 KB)

Source

Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation archive
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming language design and implementation table of contents

Chicago, IL, USA

SESSION: Domain-specific tools table of contents

Pages: 305 - 314

Year of Publication: 2005

ISBN:1-59593-056-6

Also published in ...

Authors

Lujo Bauer	Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Jay Ligatti	Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
David Walker	Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

Sponsors

SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 92, Citation Count: 26

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065010.1065047 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce a language and system that supports definition and composition of complex run-time security policies for Java applications. Our policies are comprised of two sorts of methods. The first is query methods that are called whenever an untrusted application tries to execute a security-sensitive action. A query method returns a suggestion indicating how the security-sensitive action should be handled. The second sort of methods are those that perform state updates as the policy's suggestions are followed.The structure of our policies facilitates composition, as policies can query other policies for suggestions. In order to give programmers control over policy composition, we have designed the system so that policies, suggestions, and application events are all first-class objects that a higher-order policy may manipulate. We show how to use these programming features by developing a library of policy combinators.Our system is fully implemented, and we have defined a formal semantics for an idealized subset of the language containing all of the key features. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system by implementing a large-scale security policy for an email client.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	M. Abadi and C. Fournet. Access control based on execution history. In 10th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, 2003.
	2	Ole Agesen , Stephen N. Freund , John C. Mitchell, Adding type parameterization to the Java language, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, p.49-65, October 05-09, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
	3	Apache Software Foundation. Byte Code Engineering Library, 2003. http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/.
	4	Lujo Bauer , Andrew W. Appel , Edward W. Felten, Mechanisms for secure modular programming in Java, Software—Practice & Experience, v.33 n.5, p.461-480, 25 April 2003 [doi>10.1002/spe.516]
	5	L. Bauer, J. Ligatti, and D. Walker. A language and system for composing security policies. Technical Report TR-699-04, Princeton University, Jan. 2004.
	6	Thomas Colcombet , Pascal Fradet, Enforcing trace properties by program transformation, Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.54-66, January 19-21, 2000, Boston, MA, USA [doi>10.1145/325694.325703]
	7	Ulfar Erlingsson , Fred B. Schneider, IRM Enforcement of Java Stack Inspection, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, p.246, May 14-17, 2000
	8	D. Evans and A. Twyman. Flexible policy-directed code safety. In IEEE Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, May 1999.
	9	Cédric Fournet , Andrew D. Gordon, Stack inspection: theory and variants, Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.307-318, January 16-18, 2002, Portland, Oregon
	10	Gregor Kiczales , Erik Hilsdale , Jim Hugunin , Mik Kersten , Jeffrey Palm , William G. Griswold, An Overview of AspectJ, Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, p.327-353, June 18-22, 2001
	11	M. Kim, M. Viswanathan, H. Ben-Abdallah, S. Kannan, I. Lee, and O. Sokolsky. Formally specified monitoring of temporal properties. In European Conference on Real-time Systems, York, UK, June 1999.
	12	I. Lee, S. Kannan, M. Kim, O. Sokolsky, and M. Viswanathan. Run-time assurance based on formal specifications. In International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, Las Vegas, NV, June 1999.
	13	J. Ligatti, L. Bauer, and D. Walker. Edit automata: Enforcement mechanisms for run-time security policies. International Journal of Information Security, 4(1--2):2--16, Feb. 2005.
	14	Tim Lindholm , Frank Yellin, Java Virtual Machine Specification, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
	15	E. Meijer and J. Gough. A technical overview of the Common Language Infrastructure. http://research.microsoft.com/~emeijer/Papers/CLR.pdf.
	16	A. Petersen. Pooka: A Java email client, 2003. http://www.suberic.net/pooka/.
	17	J. H. Saltzer and M. D. Schroeder. The protection of information in computer systems. In IEEE 63, 9, pages 1278--1308, Sept. 1975.
	18	Fred B. Schneider, Enforceable security policies, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), v.3 n.1, p.30-50, Feb. 2000 [doi>10.1145/353323.353382]
	19	David B. Tucker , Shriram Krishnamurthi, Pointcuts and advice in higher-order languages, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, p.158-167, March 17-21, 2003, Boston, Massachusetts [doi>10.1145/643603.643620]
	20	David Walker , Steve Zdancewic , Jay Ligatti, A theory of aspects, Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, p.127-139, August 25-29, 2003, Uppsala, Sweden

CITED BY 27

	Daniel S. Dantas , David Walker , Geoffrey Washburn , Stephanie Weirich, Poly_AML: a polymorphic aspect-oriented functional programming language, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.40 n.9, September 2005
	Daniel S. Dantas , David Walker, Harmless advice, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.41 n.1, p.383-396, January 2006
	Lieven Desmet , Wouter Joosen , Fabio Massacci , Katsiaryna Naliuka , Pieter Philippaerts , Frank Piessens , Dries Vanoverberghe, A flexible security architecture to support third-party applications on mobile devices, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Computer security architecture, November 02-02, 2007, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
	Chamseddine Talhi , Nadia Tawbi , Mourad Debbabi, Execution monitoring enforcement under memory-limitation constraints, Information and Computation, v.206 n.2-4, p.158-184, February, 2008
	Dachuan Yu , Ajay Chander , Nayeem Islam , Igor Serikov, JavaScript instrumentation for browser security, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.42 n.1, January 2007
	Kevin W. Hamlen , Greg Morrisett , Fred B. Schneider, Certified In-lined Reference Monitoring on .NET, Proceedings of the 2006 workshop on Programming languages and analysis for security, June 10-10, 2006, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
	Jay Ligatti , David Walker , Steve Zdancewic, A type-theoretic interpretation of pointcuts and advice, Science of Computer Programming, v.63 n.3, p.240-266, 15 December 2006
	Arie Orlovsky , Danny Raz, Decentralized enforcement of security policies for distributed computational systems, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing, March 11-15, 2007, Seoul, Korea
	David Basin , Ernst-Ruediger Olderog , Paul E. Sevinc, Specifying and analyzing security automata using CSP-OZ, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Information, computer and communications security, March 20-22, 2007, Singapore
	Anderson Santana de Oliveira, Rewriting-Based Access Control Policies, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), v.171 n.4, p.59-72, July, 2007
	Sanna Tuohimaa , Ville Leppänen, A compact aspect-based security monitor for J2ME applications, Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Computer systems and technologies, June 14-15, 2007, Bulgaria
	Vinod Ganapathy , David King , Trent Jaeger , Somesh Jha, Mining Security-Sensitive Operations in Legacy Code Using Concept Analysis, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.458-467, May 20-26, 2007
	Dries Vanoverberghe , Frank Piessens, Supporting Security Monitor-Aware Development, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems, p.2, May 20-26, 2007
	Lieven Desmet , Wouter Joosen , Fabio Massacci , Pieter Philippaerts , Frank Piessens , Ida Siahaan , Dries Vanoverberghe, Security-by-contract on the .NET platform, Information Security Tech. Report, v.13 n.1, p.25-32, January, 2008
	Anderson Santana de Oliveira , Eric Ke Wang , Claude Kirchner , Helene Kirchner, Weaving rewrite-based access control policies, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Formal methods in security engineering, p.71-80, November 02-02, 2007, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
	Daniel S. Dantas , David Walker , Geoffrey Washburn , Stephanie Weirich, AspectML: A polymorphic aspect-oriented functional programming language, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), v.30 n.3, p.1-60, May 2008
	Fabio Massacci , Ida S. R. Siahaan, Simulating midlet's security claims with automata modulo theory, Proceedings of the third ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Programming languages and analysis for security, June 07-13, 2008, Tucson, AZ, USA
	Kevin W. Hamlen , Micah Jones, Aspect-oriented in-lined reference monitors, Proceedings of the third ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Programming languages and analysis for security, June 07-13, 2008, Tucson, AZ, USA
	Irem Aktug , Katsiaryna Naliuka, ConSpec – A formal language for policy specification, Science of Computer Programming, v.74 n.1-2, p.2-12, December, 2008
	Phu H. Phung , David Sands , Andrey Chudnov, Lightweight self-protecting JavaScript, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information, Computer, and Communications Security, March 10-12, 2009, Sydney, Australia
	Jay Ligatti , Lujo Bauer , David Walker, Run-Time Enforcement of Nonsafety Policies, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), v.12 n.3, p.1-41, January 2009
	Chamseddine Talhi , Nadia Tawbi , Mourad Debbabi, Execution monitoring enforcement for limited-memory systems, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust: Bridge the Gap Between PST Technologies and Business Services, October 30-November 01, 2006, Markham, Ontario, Canada
	Lujo Bauer , Jay Ligatti , David Walker, Composing expressive runtime security policies, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.18 n.3, p.1-43, May 2009
	Dries Vanoverberghe , Frank Piessens, Security enforcement aware software development, Information and Software Technology, v.51 n.7, p.1172-1185, July, 2009
	Ninghui Li , Qihua Wang , Wahbeh Qardaji , Elisa Bertino , Prathima Rao , Jorge Lobo , Dan Lin, Access control policy combining: theory meets practice, Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, June 03-05, 2009, Stresa, Italy
	Massimo Bartoletti , Pierpaolo Degano , Gian-Luigi Ferrari , Roberto Zunino, Local policies for resource usage analysis, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), v.31 n.6, p.1-43, August 2009
	Hejiao Huang , Helene Kirchner , Songyun Liu , Weili Wu, Handling inheritance violation for secure interoperation of heterogeneous systems, International Journal of Security and Networks, v.4 n.4, p.223-233, September 2009