ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Graceful service degradation (or, how to know your payment is late)
Full text PdfPdf (276 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Pages: 9 - 18  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-049-3
Authors
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1064009.1064011
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

When distributing digital content over a broadcast channel it's often necessary to revoke users whose access privileges have expired, thus preventing them from recovering the content. This works well when users make a conscious decision to leave the system or have misbehaved, but numerous cases exist in which the revocation is in error and users are consequently left with the often onerous burden of getting reinstated. We introduce a gradual form of revocation that we call service degradation that enables the content distributor to provide "cues" to the user in the form of degraded system performance. The cues alert the user to their impending revocation and allow them to take the necessary action to remain in the system. Our protocols build on techniques for broadcast encryption and spam-fighting to provide the appropriate form of service for this previously ignored class of users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Abadi, M. Burrows, M. Manasse and T. Wobber. Moderately hard, memory-bound functions. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium, 2003.
 
2
 
3
A. Andoni and J. Staddon. Graceful Service Degradation (or, How to Know your Payment is Late) (Full Version). Available at http://www.mit.edu/ andoni and http://www.parc.com/jstaddon
4
 
5
S. Berkovits. How to broadcast a secret. Advances in Cryptology --- Eurocrypt '91, volume 547 of LNCS, pages 535--541. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
 
6
R. Canetti, J. Garay, G. Itkis, D. Micciancio, M. Naor, B. Pinkas. Multicast security: A taxonomy and efficient constructions. IEEE INFOCOM, 1999.
 
7
Directory of Online Schools, http://www.directoryofonlineschools.com
 
8
Y. Dodis and N. Fazio. Public key broadcast encryption for stateless receivers. ACM CCS Workshop on Digital Rights Management 2002.
 
9
C. Dwork, A. Goldberg and M. Naor. On memory-bound functions for fighting spam. Advances in Cryptology -- Crypto 2003.
 
10
11
 
12
E. Engelking. Are you in favor of Microsoft's new XP licensing program? Tech Republic, May 4, 2001. http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-6270-1032935.html
 
13
 
14
C. Gentry, Z. Ramzan. RSA Accumulator Based Broadcast Encryption. 7th Information Security Conference, 2004.
 
15
 
16
 
17
Keyhole, http://www.keyhole.com
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
24
 
25
 
26
U. C. Berkeley Extension Online. http://learn.berkeley.edu
 
27
D.M. Wallner, E.J. Harder, R.C. Agee. RFC 2627 -- Key management for multicast: Issues and architectures. Available at http://www.rfc-archive.org.
28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alexandr Andoni: colleagues
Jessica Staddon: colleagues