ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Finding group shilling in recommendation system
Full text PdfPdf (157 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Special interest tracks and posters of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Chiba, Japan
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 960 - 961  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-051-5
Authors
Xue-Feng Su  Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, P.R.China
Hua-Jun Zeng  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, P.R.China
Zheng Chen  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, P.R.China
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062745.1062818
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the age of information explosion, recommendation system has been proved effective to cope with information overload in e-commerce area. However, unscrupulous producers shill the systems in many ways to make profit, and it makes the system imprecise and unreliable in a long term. Among many shilling behaviors, a new form of attack, called group shilling, appears and does great harm to the system. Because group shilling users are now well organized and become more hidden among various normal users, it is hard to find them by traditional methods. However, these group shilling users are similar to some extent, for they both shill the target items. We bring out a similarity spreading algorithm to find these group shilling users and protect recommendation system from unfair ratings. In our algorithm, we try to find these cunning group shilling users through propagating similarities from items to users iteratively. The experiment shows our similarity spreading algorithm improves the precision of the system and provides the system a reliable protection.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
J. Konstan and J. Riedl. Good ratings gone bad: study shows recommender systems can manipulate users' opinions. CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. April 2003.
4
5
6
7


Collaborative Colleagues:
Xue-Feng Su: colleagues
Hua-Jun Zeng: colleagues
Zheng Chen: colleagues