|
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we design techniques that exploit data correlations in sensor data to minimize communication costs (and hence, energy costs) incurred during data gathering in a sensor network. Our proposed approach is to select a small subset of sensor nodes that may be sufficient to reconstruct data for the entire sensor network. Then, during data gathering only the selected sensors need to be involved in communication. The selected set of sensors must also be connected, since they need to relay data to the data-gathering node. We define the problem of selecting such a set of sensors as the connected correlation-dominating set problem, and formulate it in terms of an appropriately defined correlation structure that captures general data correlations in a sensor network.We develop a set of energy-efficient distributed algorithms and competitive centralized heuristics to select a connected correlation-dominating set of small size. The designed distributed algorithms can be implemented in an asynchronous communication model, and can tolerate message losses. We also design an exponential (but non-exhaustive) centralized approximation algorithm that returns a solution within O(log n) of the optimal size. Based on the approximation algorithm, we design a class of efficient centralized heuristics that are empirically shown to return near-optimal solutions. Simulation results over randomly generated sensor networks with both artificially and naturally generated data sets demonstrate the efficiency of the designed algorithms and the viability of our technique -- even in dynamic conditions.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
A. Cerpa and D. Estrin. Ascent: Adaptive self-configuring sensor networks topologies. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2002.
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
J. Chou, D. Petrovic, and K. Ramchandran. A distributed and adaptive signal processing approach to reducing energy consumption in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
R. Cristescu, B. Beferull-Lozano, and M. Vetterli. On network correlated data gathering. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
D. Culler et al. TinyOS. http://www.tinyos.net, 2004.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
B. Deb, S. Bhatnagar, and B. Nath. Multi-resolution state retrieval in sensor networks. In Proceedings of Intl.\ Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003.
|
| |
13
|
Devdatt Dubhashi , Alessandro Mei , Alessandro Panconesi , Jaikumar Radhakrishnan , Arvind Srinivasan, Fast distributed algorithms for (weakly) connected dominating sets and linear-size skeletons, Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, January 12-14, 2003, Baltimore, Maryland
|
| |
14
|
M. Enachescu, A. Goel, R. Govindan, and R. Motwani. Scale free aggregation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks (Algosensors), 2004.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
S. Guha and S. Khuller. Approximation algorithms for connected dominating sets. Algorithmica, 20(4), 1998.
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
Jason Hill , Robert Szewczyk , Alec Woo , Seth Hollar , David Culler , Kristofer Pister, System architecture directions for networked sensors, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, p.93-104, November 2000, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
|
| |
20
|
S. M. Kay. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory, Vol. II. Prentice-Hall, 1998.
|
| |
21
|
A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, and L. Viennot. Multipoint relaying: An efficient technique for flooding in mobile wireless networks. In Proc. of the Hawaii Intl. Conf. on System Sciences, 2002.
|
| |
22
|
D. Marco, E. Duarte-Melo, M. Liu, and D. L. Neuhoff. On the many-to-one transport capacity of a dense wireless sensor network and the compressibility of its data. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2003.
|
| |
23
|
National Climatic Data Center. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/res40.pl?page=gsod.html.
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
 |
26
|
Victor Shnayder , Mark Hempstead , Bor-rong Chen , Geoff Werner Allen , Matt Welsh, Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031518]
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
J. Wu and F. Dai. Broadcasting in ad hoc networks based on self-pruning. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.
|
| |
29
|
J. Wu and H. Li. A dominating-set-based routing scheme in ad hoc wireless networks. Telecommunication Systems Journal, 3, 2001.
|
 |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
S. Yoon and C. Shahabi. Exploiting spatial correlation towards an energy efficient clustered aggregation technique (cag). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2005.
|
CITED BY 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Péter Schaffer , István Vajda, Cora: correlation-based resilient aggregation in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, October 22-26, 2007, Chania, Crete Island, Greece
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|