ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sextant: a unified node and event localization framework using non-convex constraints
Full text PdfPdf (209 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
SESSION: Location services table of contents
Pages: 205 - 216  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-004-3
Authors
Saikat Guha  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Rohan Murty  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Emin Gün Sirer  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062689.1062715
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Determining node and event locations is a canonical task for many wireless network applications. Yet dedicated infrastructure for determining position information is expensive, energy-consuming, and simply unavailable in many deployment scenarios. This paper presents an accurate, cheap and scalable framework, called Sextant, for determining node position and event location in sensor networks. Sextant operates by setting up and solving a system of geographic constraints based on connectivity information from the underlying communication network. Sextant achieves high accuracy by enabling non-convex constraints to be used to refine position estimates. It represents position estimates as potentially non-contiguous collections of points. This general representation enables Sextant to use _negative information_, that is, information on where a node or event is not located, to refine location estimates. Sextant unifies both node and event detection within the same general framework. It can provide high precision without dedicated localization hardware by aggressively extracting constraints from the link layer, representing areas precisely with Bézier-enclosed polygons and probability distributions, and using event detection to refine node position estimates. A compact representation and a fully distributed implementation make the framework practical for resource-limited devices. The framework has been implemented, deployed and tested on laptops, PDAs and Mica-2 motes. Physical experiments show that a large number (98%) of the nodes in a network can determine their positions based on a small number (30%) of landmark nodes and that a large number (90%) of events can be located with low median error.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
L. Blazevic, S. Giordano, and J. L. Boudec, "Self-Organizing Wide-Area Routing," in Proceedings of World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL, July 2000.
3
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
D. Niculescu and B. Nath, "Ad Hoc Positioning System Using AoA," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM Conference on Computer Communications, San Fransisco, CA, 2003.
 
9
------, "Ad Hoc Positioning System," in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Antonio, TX, Nov. 2001, pp. 2926--2931.
10
11
12
 
13
R. Stoleru and J. A. Stankovic, "Probability Grid: A Location Estimation Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, Santa Clara, CA, Oct. 2004.
 
14
K. Lorincz and M. Welsh, "A Robust, Decentralized Approach to RF-Based Location Tracking," Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Tech. Rep. TR-19-04, 2004.
 
15
J. Chen and R. E. Hudson, "Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, pp. 1843--1854, Aug. 2002.
 
16
R. Brooks, C. Griffin, and D. Friedlander, "Self-Organized Distributed Sensor Network Entity Tracking," International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol. 16, no. 5, Aug. 2002.
17
18
 
19
P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan, "RADAR: An In-Building RF-Based User Location and Tracking System," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM Conference on Computer Communications, 2000, pp. 775--784.
 
20
 
21
D. Assaf, "The Sensitivity of Spline Functions on Triangulations to Vertex Perturbation," Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University, May 1998.
22
 
23
 
24
A. Ward, A. Jones, and A. Hopper, "A New Location Technique for the Active Office," IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 42--47, Oct. 1997.
25
26
 
27
N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, "GPS-Less Low Cost Outdoor Localization for Very Small Devices," in Proceedings of IEEE Personal Communications, May 2000, pp. 28--34.
 
28
 
29
L. Doherty, K. S. J. Pister, and L. E. Ghaoui, "Convex Position Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 3, Anchorage, AK, Apr. 2001, pp. 1655--1663.
30
 
31
F. Zhao, J. Liu, J. Liu, L. Guibas, and J. Reich, "Collaborative Signal and Information Processing: An Information Directed Approach," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1199--1209, Aug. 2003.
 
32
J. Sallai, G. Balogh, M. Maroti, and A. Ledeczi, "Acoustic Ranging in Resource Constrained Sensor Networks," Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, Tech. Rep. ISIS-04-504, 2004.
33
 
34
35


Collaborative Colleagues:
Saikat Guha: colleagues
Rohan Murty: colleagues
Emin Gün Sirer: colleagues