ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Stationary distributions of random walk mobility models for wireless ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (199 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
SESSION: Topology control & mobility table of contents
Pages: 90 - 98  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-004-3
Author
Michael McGuire  University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 114,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062689.1062702
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

To properly use a mobility model to evaluate a wireless network policy via computer simulations it is necessary to know the statistics of mobile terminal locations for the model. Unfortunately, these statistics are only known for a limited number of mobility models which limits the analysis of wireless networks that can be done using computer simulations. This paper presents a method for calculating an approximation of the steady-state distribution of mobile terminal locations for a general class of mobility models. The motion models in this class are specified by the conditional distribution of destination points given source points, the distribution of speed, and the distribution of pause times for each motion link. The continuous time distributions of mobile terminal locations and velocities are then derived from the motion link steady-state distributions. This knowledge will enable researchers to use low cost computer simulations to effectively evaluate new wireless network policies for a wide variety of mobility patterns.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy. IMPORTANT: A framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks. In INFOCOM 2003, pages 825--835, 2003.
 
2
3
 
4
T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5):483--502, August 2002.
 
5
R.-S. Chan, W.-Y. Chen, and Y.-F. Wen. Hybrid wireless network protocols. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 52(4):1099--1109, July 2003.
 
6
G. Grimmett and D. Stirzaker. Probability and Random Processes. Oxford University Press Inc., second edition, 1992.
 
7
H.-Y. Hsieh and R. Sivakumar. On using peer-to-peer communication in cellular wireless data networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(1):57--72, January-March 2004.
 
8
E. Kreyszig. Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications. John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
 
9
A. Leon-Garcia. Probability and Random Processes for Electrical Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Toronto, second edition, 1994.
 
10
W. Navidi and T. Camp. Stationary distributions for the random waypoint mobility model. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(1):99--108, January-March 2004.
 
11
A. Papoulis and S. Pillai. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, fourth edition, 2002.
 
12
J. Rasmussen. Compact linear operators and Krylov subspace methods. Master's thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mathematics, 2001.
 
13
J. Yoon, M. Liu, and B. Noble. Random waypoint considered harmful. In INFOCOM 2003, pages 1312--1321, 2003.

CITED BY  7