ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Clinical requirements engineering
Full text PdfPdf (744 KB)
Source International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering table of contents
St. Louis, MO, USA
SESSION: Extending the discipline table of contents
Pages: 28 - 34  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-963-2
Author
Stephen Fickas  University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 78,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062455.1062467
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I make a case for integration of requirements engineering (RE) with clinical disciplines. To back my case, I look at two examples that employ a clinical RE approach, first, that of introducing email into the life of a brain-injured individual, and second, introducing digital darkroom tools into my life. The former uses a Brownfield approach by starting with an existing clinical process, cognitive rehabilitation, and then defining an RE process that fits. The latter uses a Greenfield approach that postulates a new clinical RE process that focuses on the problems some of us have using digital darkroom tools.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Balzer and N. Goldman. Mediating Connectors. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Austin, TX, May 1999, 73--77.
 
2
Brain Injury Association, Inc., (2000). BIA Community Awareness Presentation. CD ROM. Available from the Brain Injury Association, Inc.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
LoPresti, E., A. Mihailidis, and N. Kirsch, Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004.
 
7
 
8
Sohlberg, M.M., Fickas, S., Ehlhardt, L. & Todis, B. (in press). Case Study Report: The Longitudinal Effects of Accessible Email for Four Participants with Severe Cognitive Impairments. Journal of Aphasiology, 2005.
 
9
Sohlberg, M. M., Fickas, S., Hung, P., Lemoncello, R. (2004). Community Navigation Profiles for Six Individuals with Severe Cognitive Impairments. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Seattle, WA.
 
10
Sohlberg, M. M., Ehlhardt, E., Fickas, S., & Sutcliff, A. (2003). A pilot study exploring electronic mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Injury, 17(7), 609--629.
 
11
Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive Rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: Guildford Press.