|
ABSTRACT
Conformal parameterization of mesh models has numerous applications
in geometry processing. Conformality is desirable for remeshing,
surface reconstruction, and many other mesh processing
applications. Subject to the conformality requirement, these
applications typically benefit from parameterizations with smaller
stretch. The Angle Based Flattening (ABF) method, presented a few
years ago, generates provably valid conformal parameterizations
with low stretch. However, it is quite time-consuming and becomes
error prone for large meshes due to numerical error accumulation.
This work presents ABF++, a highly efficient
extension of the ABF method, that overcomes these drawbacks while
maintaining all the advantages of ABF. ABF++ robustly parameterizes
meshes of hundreds of thousands and millions of triangles within
minutes. It is based on three main components: (1) a new numerical
solution technique that dramatically reduces the dimension of the
linear systems solved at each iteration, speeding up the solution;
(2) a new robust scheme for reconstructing the 2D coordinates from
the angle space solution that avoids the numerical instabilities
which hindered the ABF reconstruction scheme; and (3) an efficient
hierarchical solution technique. The speedup with (1) does not come
at the expense of greater distortion. The hierarchical technique
(3) enables parameterization of models with millions of faces in
seconds at the expense of a minor increase in parametric
distortion. The parameterization computed by ABF++ are provably
valid, that is they contain no flipped triangles. As a result of
these extensions, the ABF++ method is extremely suitable for
robustly and efficiently parameterizing models for
geometry-processing applications.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Degener, P., Meseth, J., and Klein, R. 2003. An adaptable surface parametrization method. In 12th International Meshing Roundtable. 201--213.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Desbrun, M., Meyer, M., and Alliez, P. 2002. Intrinsic parameterizations of surface meshes. In Proceedings of Eurographics. 209--218.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Floater, M. S. and Hormann, K. 2004. Surface parameterization: A tutorial and survey. In Advances on Multiresolution in Geometric Modelling. M. S. F. N. Dodgson and M. Sabin, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
|
| |
10
|
Graphite. 2003. http://www.loria.fr/levy/Graphite/index.html.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Gu, X. and Yau, S.-T. 2002. Computing conformal structures of surfaces. Comm. Inform. Syst. 2, 121--146.
|
| |
13
|
Hormann, K. 2001. Theory and applications of parameterizing triangulations. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Erlangen.
|
| |
14
|
Hormann, K. and Greiner, G. 2000. MIPS: An efficient global parametrization method. In Curve and Surface Design: Saint Malo 1999. P.-J. Laurent, P. Sablonniëre, and L. Schumaker, Eds. Vanderbilt University Press, 153--162.
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Lévy, B., Petitjean, S., Ray, N., and Maillot, J. 2002. Least squares conformal maps. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH). 362--371.
|
| |
18
|
Lévy, B., Petitjean, S., Ray, N., and Maillot, J. 2003. http://www.loria.fr/levy/erratum.html.
|
| |
19
|
Liesen, J., de Sturler, E., Sheffer, A., Aydin, Y., and Siefert, C. 2001. Preconditioners for indefinite linear systems arising in surface parameterization. In Proceedings of the 11th International Meshing Roundtable. 71--81.
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
Mogilnitsky, M. 2004. Efficient, low distortion, conformal parameterization of large meshes. MS thesis, Technion.
|
| |
23
|
Nocedal and Wright. 2000. Numerical Optimization. Springer.
|
| |
24
|
Pinkall, U. and Polthier, K. 1993. Computing discrete minimal surfaces and their conjugates. Experiment. Math. 2, 15.
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
Sheffer, A. and de Sturler, E. 2001. Parameterization of faceted surfaces for meshing using angle based flattening. Engin. Comput. 17, 326--337.
|
| |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
Strang, G. 1988. Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 3rd Ed., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego.
|
 |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
Tutte, W. 1960. Convex representation of graphs. In Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society Vol. 10.
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
Zayer, R., Roessl, C., and Seidel, H. P. 2004. Variations on angle based flattening. Proceedings of Mingle Workshop.
|
CITED BY 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Weyrich , Wojciech Matusik , Hanspeter Pfister , Bernd Bickel , Craig Donner , Chien Tu , Janet McAndless , Jinho Lee , Addy Ngan , Henrik Wann Jensen , Markus Gross, Analysis of human faces using a measurement-based skin reflectance model, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.25 n.3, July 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mario Botsch , Mark Pauly , Christian Rossl , Stephan Bischoff , Leif Kobbelt, Geometric modeling based on triangle meshes, ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses, July 30-August 03, 2006, Boston, Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hongyu Wang , Ying He , Xin Li , Xianfeng Gu , Hong Qin, Polycube splines, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Solid and physical modeling, June 04-06, 2007, Beijing, China
|
|
|
Hongyu Wang , Ying He , Xin Li , Xianfeng Gu , Hong Qin, Technical Section: Geometry-aware domain decomposition for T-spline-based manifold modeling, Computers and Graphics, v.33 n.3, p.359-368, June, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hongyu Wang , Miao Jin , Ying He , Xianfeng Gu , Hong Qin, User-controllable polycube map for manifold spline construction, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Solid and physical modeling, June 02-04, 2008, Stony Brook, New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hongyu Wang , Ying He , Xin Li , Xianfeng Gu , Hong Qin, Polycube splines, Computer-Aided Design, v.40 n.6, p.721-733, June, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|