ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users
Full text PdfPdf (212 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Chiba, Japan
SESSION: Improving the browsing experience table of contents
Pages: 583 - 592  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-046-9
Authors
Anne Aula  University of Tampere, Finland
Natalie Jhaveri  University of Tampere, Finland
Mika Käki  University of Tampere, Finland
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 176,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060745.1060831
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Experienced web users have strategies for information search and re-access that are not directly supported by web browsers or search engines. We studied how prevalent these strategies are and whether even experienced users have problems with searching and re-accessing information. With this aim, we conducted a survey with 236 experienced web users. The results showed that this group has frequently used key strategies (e.g., using several browser windows in parallel) that they find important, whereas some of the strategies that have been suggested in previous studies are clearly less important for them (e.g., including URLs on a webpage). In some aspects, such as query formulation, this group resembles less experienced web users. For instance, we found that most of the respondents had misconceptions about how their search engine handles queries, as well as other problems with information search and re-access. In addition to presenting the prevalence of the strategies and rationales for their use, we present concrete designs solutions and ideas for making the key strategies also available to less experienced users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Anderson, J.R. Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2000).
 
4
Aula, A. Query Formulation in Web Information Search. In Isaias, P. & Karmakar, N. (Eds.) Proc. IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2003, Volume I, 403--410. IADIS Press (2003).
 
5
Aula, A. and Käki, M. Understanding Expert Search Strategies for Designing User-Friendly Search Interfaces. In Isaias, P. & Karmakar, N. (Eds.) Proc. IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2003, Volume II, 759--762. IADIS Press (2003).
 
6
 
7
Bruce, H., Jones, W., and Dumais, S. Keeping and re-finding information on the web: What do people do and what do they need? In Proc. ASIST 2004, Chicago, IL, Information Today, Inc., October, 2004.
8
 
9
 
10
Cockburn, A., Greenberg, S., Jones, S. McKenzie, B. and Moyle, M. Improving web page revisitation: Analysis, design and evaluation. IT & Society, 1, 3 (2003), 159--183.
 
11
 
12
Dhamija, R. and Perrig, A. Déjà Vu: A user study using images for authentication. In Proc. 9th USENIX Security Symposium, 2000.
13
 
14
Fox, S. Search engines: A Pew Internet project data memo (2002). Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=64
 
15
 
16
iBoogie Metasearch Clustering Engine. http://www.iboogie.com
 
17
 
18
Jansen, B.J. and Spink, A. (in press) How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing and Management, in press.
 
19
20
21
 
22
Jones, W., Bruce, H., and Dumais, S. How do people get back to information on the web? How can they do it better? In Proc. INTERACT 2003, 793--796.
 
23
Kaasten, S., Greenberg, S., and Edwards, C. How people recognize previously seen WWW pages from titles, URLs and thumbnails. In X. Faulkner, J. Finlay and F. Detienne (Eds.) Proc. of Human Computer Interaction 2002, BCS Conference Series, 247--265.
24
25
26
 
27
Käki, M. and Aula, A. Findex: Improving search result use through automatic filtering categories. To appear in Interacting with Computers.
 
28
OmniGroup. OmniWeb. http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omniweb/
 
29
Pirolli, P. and Card, S. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 4 (1999), 643--685.
30
 
31
 
32
Straub, D.W. Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (2001), 1--16.
 
33
Sutcliffe, A. and Ennis, M. Towards a cognitive theory of information retrieval. Interacting with Computers, 10 (1998), 321--351.
34
 
35
Visimo Clustering Engine. http://www.vivisimo.com
 
36
Wen, J. Post-valued recall web pages: User disorientation hits the big time. IT & Society, 1, 2 (2003), 184--194.
 
37
WiseNut. http://www.wisenut.com
38

CITED BY  24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anne Aula: colleagues
Natalie Jhaveri: colleagues
Mika Käki: colleagues