ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing sticky knowledge networks
Full text HtmlHtml (26 KB),  PdfPdf (233 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 48 ,  Issue 5  (May 2005) table of contents
Adaptive complex enterprises
Pages: 66 - 71  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Ashley A. Bush  Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Amrit Tiwana  Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 112,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060710.1060711
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Much of any organization's experience and expertise remains underused and underexploited simply because it resides not in databases, repositories, or manuals but in the minds of its employees. Attempting to harness such distributed expertise, organizations have begun implementing collaborative knowledge networks---peer-to-peer digital networks connecting individuals with relevant expertise to their peers who need it [10, 11]. Unfortunately, however, successful knowledge networks represent the occasional island dotting a sea of failures. While many organizations are eager adopters of knowledge network systems, individual users frequently abandon them, leaving a trail of million- dollar paperweights. To be self-sustaining, knowledge networks must be sticky, though stickiness is an elusive design objective.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Arkes, H. and Blumer, C. The psychology of sunk cost. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 35, 1 (Feb. 1985), 124---140.
 
2
Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25, 3 (Sept. 2001), 351---370.
3
4
 
5
Goffman, E. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. The Free Press, New York, 1963.
 
6
Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. American J. Sociology 78 (May 1973), 1360---1380.
 
7
Hansen, M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44, 1 (Mar. 1999), 83---111.
8
 
9
Simon, H. We and they: The human urge to identify with groups. Industrial and Corporate Change 11, 3 (June 2002), 607---610.
10
 
11
Tiwana, A. and Bush, A. Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: A social perspective. IEEE Transact. Engineer. Mgt. 52, 1 (Feb. 2005), 85---101.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ashley A. Bush: colleagues
Amrit Tiwana: colleagues