ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Secure routing for structured peer-to-peer overlay networks
Source Operating Systems Design and Implementation archive
Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Operating systems design and implementation

Due to copyright restrictions we are not able to make the PDFs for this conference available for downloading

table of contents
Boston, Massachusetts
SESSION: Peer-to-peer infrastructure table of contents
Pages: 299 - 314  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:0163-5980
Authors
Miguel Castro  Microsoft Research Ltd., Cambridge, UK
Peter Druschel  Rice University, Houston, TX
Ayalvadi Ganesh  Microsoft Research Ltd., Cambridge, UK
Antony Rowstron  Microsoft Research Ltd., Cambridge, UK
Dan S. Wallach  Rice University, Houston, TX
Sponsor
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 59
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060289.1060317
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Structured peer-to-peer overlay networks provide a substrate for the construction of large-scale, decentralized applications, including distributed storage, group communication, and content distribution. These overlays are highly resilient; they can route messages correctly even when a large fraction of the nodes crash or the network partitions. But current overlays are not secure; even a small fraction of malicious nodes can prevent correct message delivery throughout the overlay. This problem is particularly serious in open peer-to-peer systems, where many diverse, autonomous parties without preexisting trust relationships wish to pool their resources. This paper studies attacks aimed at preventing correct message delivery in structured peer-to-peer overlays and presents defenses to these attacks. We describe and evaluate techniques that allow nodes to join the overlay, to maintain routing state, and to forward messages securely in the presence of malicious nodes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. The exact security of digital signatures- How to sign with RSA and Rabin. In Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 96, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1070. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
 
2
Steve Bellovin. Security aspects of Napster and Gnutella. In 2001 Usenix Annual Technical Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, June 2001. Invited talk.
 
3
Miguel Castro, Peter Druschel, Y. Charlie Hu, and Antony Rowstron. Exploiting network proximity in peer-to-peer overlay networks. Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-82, Microsoft Research, May 2002.
 
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
Drew Dean and Adam Stubblefield. Using client puzzles to protect TLS. In 10th Usenix Security Symposium, pages 1--8, Washington, D.C., August 2001.
 
9
Roger Dingledine, Michael J. Freedman, and David Molnar. Accountability measures for peer-to-peer systems. In Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies. O'Reilly and Associates, November 2000.
 
10
11
12
 
13
Ari Juels and John Brainard. Client puzzles: A cryptographic defense against connection depletion attacks. In Internet Society Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security (NDSS '99), pages 151--165, San Diego, California, February 1999.
 
14
15
16
 
17
18
 
19
20
 
21

CITED BY  59
Collaborative Colleagues:
Miguel Castro: colleagues
Peter Druschel: colleagues
Ayalvadi Ganesh: colleagues
Antony Rowstron: colleagues
Dan S. Wallach: colleagues