ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Electronic meeting systems
Full text PdfPdf (3.44 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 34 ,  Issue 7  (July 1991) table of contents
Special issue on computer graphics: state of the arts
Pages: 40 - 61  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
J. F. Nunamaker  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Alan R. Dennis  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Joseph S. Valacich  Univ. of Indiana, Bloomington
Douglas Vogel  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Joey F. George  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 41,   Downloads (12 Months): 315,   Citation Count: 214
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/105783.105793
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ackoff R,,{ gupta, s.k. and Minas. j.s. scientific method, john wiley & sons, 1962.
 
2
Albanese, R. and Van Fleet, D.D. Rational behavior in group,: The free riding tendency. Academ,; o)~ Management Review, 10 (1985), 244 255.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Paranka, D. Supporting the search for competitive advantage. Journal of MIS, forthcoming.
 
8
 
9
Dennis, A.R., Tyran, C.K., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. An evaluation of electronic meeting support for strategic management. In Proceedings oflCIS (1990), 37-52.
 
10
Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. An experimental investigation of group size in an electronic meeting system environment. IEEE Transactions on System. s, Man, and Cybernetic.~, 20, 5 (1990), 1049-1057.
 
11
Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Group, Subgroup and Nominal Group Idea Generation in an Electronic Meeting Environment, HICSS-24, 1991, III: 573-579.
 
12
 
13
Diehl, M. and Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 3 (1987), 497-509.
 
14
Easton, A.C., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Stakeh~lder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: An experimental study. HICSS-22, 1989, IIl 344-352.
 
15
 
16
 
17
Gatlupe, R.B., Cooper, W. and Bastianutti, L. Why is electronic brainstorming more productive than traditional brainstorming. Adminis~ trative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Proceedings, Information Systems Division (Whistler, Canada, 1990), 82-92.
 
18
Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Bastianutti, L. Group size and electronic brainstorming. Queen's University Working Paper, 1991.
 
19
George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunsmaker Jr., J.F. and Northcraft, G.B. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer based support. Inf. Syst. Res., t, 4 (1990), 394-415.
 
20
 
21
Hackman, J.R. and Kaplan, R.E. Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sci- ~ces, 5 (1974), 459-480.
 
22
Hill, G.W. Group versus individual performance: Are N + I heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3 (1982), 517-539.
23
 
24
Hirokawa, R.Y. and Pace, R. A descriptive investigation of the possible communication based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Commun. Mono- ~ffraphs, 50 (1983), 363-379.
 
25
}tuber, G.P. Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Qm, rterly, (1984), 195-204.
 
26
Huber, G.P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technology on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. o/ Manag. Rev., 15, 1 (1990), 47-71
 
27
Jabtin, F.M. and Seibold, D.R. Implications fbr problem solving groups of empirical research on 'brainstorming': A critical review of the literature. The Southern States Speech Commun. J., 43 (Summer 1978), 327-356.
 
28
 
29
Jessup, L.M. Tansik, D.A. and Lasse, 'F.D. Group problem solving in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity on group process and outcome with a GDSS. Decision Sciences, forthcoming.
 
30
Lamm, H. and Trommsdorff, G. Group versus individual perfor. mance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. EuropeanJ. of Soc. Psy., (1973), 361-387.
 
31
Maidique, M.A. Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovations. Slosh Manag. Rev., 21, 2 (1980), 59-76.
 
32
Mason, R.O. and Mitrof{, t.t.C.hat~ &ng'ing St~ate,45c Planning A.ssump tion~s:,John Wiley & Sons. New York. 198I~.
 
33
Milter, J.C. Information input overload and psychopathology. J2 of Psy. chiatry, (Feb. 1960), 696-704.
 
34
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 2I (1976), 246-275.
 
35
 
36
 
37
Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Vogel, D., Heminger, A., Martz, B.~ Grohowski, R. and McGoff, C. Experiences at IBM with group support systems. A field study Decision support systems, 5,2 (1989), 183- 196.
 
38
Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination. principles and procedures of Creative Thinking, 2nd edition, Scribners, New York. 1957.
 
39
Pinsonnault, A. and Kraemar, K.I., The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Syst., 5,2 (1989). 197-216.
 
40
Poole, M.S. Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences of decision making. Communication Monographs, 50 (1983), 206-232.
 
41
Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R., and REchner, P.I., Experimental effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making, Academy of Management Review, 32, 4 (1989), 745-772.
 
42
Shaw, M. Group Dynamics: The Psy chology of Small Group behavior. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill, New york, 1981.
 
43
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V. Kiesler, S. and McGuire, T.W. Group processes in computer mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37 (1986), 157-187.
 
44
Silver. M.S. Decision support systems: Directed and non-directed change. information Systems Research. 1, I (1990), 47-70.
 
45
Simon. H.A. Administrative behavior 3rd edition, Free press, 1976.
46
 
47
Steiner, I.D. Group Process and productivity. Academic press, new York, 1972.
 
48
 
49
Valacich, J.S., Dennis. A.R., George. J.F. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Electronic support for group idea generation: Shifitin the balance of process gains and losses. Arizona working paper, 1991.
 
50
Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Anonymity and group size effects on computer mediated idea generation. proceedings of Academy of management meeting, 1991, forthcoming.
 
51
 
52
 
53
Vogel, D.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., George, J.F. and Dennis, A.R. Group decision support systems: Evolution and status at the university of Arizona. In R.M. Leee, A.M. McCosh, and P. Migliarese Eds. organizational Decision Support Systems, proceedings of IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference on organizational DSS, North Holland. 1988. 287- 305.
 
54
Williams, E. 1977, Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and medidated communication: A review. Psychol. Bull., 84. 5, 963-976.
 
55
 
56
Zack. M.H. and McKenney, J.I., Characteristics of organizational information domain; An organizational information processing perspective. Harvard Business School Working Paper 89-027, 1989.
 
57
Zajonc. R.B. Socaial facilitation. Science, 149 (1965), 269-274.

CITED BY  214


REVIEW

"Deborah A. Kirkman : Reviewer"

One of the newer areas of research in networking services is supporting group interactions and decision making. The University of Arizona is active in this area, and has developed a meeting environment called the Electronic Meeting System (EMS  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
J. F. Nunamaker: colleagues
Alan R. Dennis: colleagues
Joseph S. Valacich: colleagues
Douglas Vogel: colleagues
Joey F. George: colleagues