Voting and political information gathering on paper and online

ABSTRACT

Electronic voting is slowly making its way into American politics. At the same time, more voters and potential voters are using online news and political information sources to help them make voting choices. We conducted a mock-voting study, using real candidates, issues, and campaign materials. Political information was browsed either online or on paper, and participants marked electronic ballots either while they browsed or later, in a separate step. Our initial data shows that voters prefer electronic browsing although they are no faster or slower with paper materials. Voters felt that they understood the issues best when they voted during browsing, and they felt most confident about their decisions when they studied electronic campaign materials alongside an active electronic ballot.

REFERENCES

• 1: Choo, C.W., Detlor, B., and Turnbull, D. (2000). Information seeking on the web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, Vol 5(2), Feb. http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_2/choo/.
• 2: Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297--1326.
• 3: Larson, L. and Raine, L. (2002). The rise of the e-citizen: How people use government agencies' web sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project Report, April 3. 2002. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Govt_Website_Rpt.pdf.
• 4: Lau, R., and Redlawsk, D. (2001a). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, October, 951--971.
• 5: Lau, R. and Redlawsk, D. (2001b). An experimental study of information search, memory, and decision making during a political campaign. In Kuklinski, J. Ed. Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• 6: Madden, M. (2003). America's online pursuits: The changing picture of who's online and what they do. Pew Internet & American Life Project Report, Dec. 22. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=106.
• 7: Gary Marchionini, Information seeking in electronic environments, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1995
• 8: Kenton O'Hara , Abigail Sellen, A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.335-342, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258787]
• 9: Scott P. Robertson, Voter-centered design: Toward a voter decision support system, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.12 n.2, p.263-292, June 2005 [doi>10.1145/1067860.1067866]
• 10: UCLA Online Campaign Literature Archive. http://digital.library.ucla.edu/campaign/.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.1 Public Policy Issues

Keywords:
digital government, electronic voting, user studies, voter support system