ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI
Full text PdfPdf (584 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Interruptions and attention 2: attending to interruptions table of contents
Pages: 919 - 928  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-998-5
Authors
Antti Oulasvirta  Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Helsinki, Finland
Sakari Tamminen  Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland
Virpi Roto  Nokia Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
Jaana Kuorelahti  Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 255,   Citation Count: 46
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055101
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

When on the move, cognitive resources are reserved partly for passively monitoring and reacting to contexts and events, and partly for actively constructing them. The Re-source Competition Framework (RCF), building on the Multiple Resources Theory, explains how psychosocial tasks typical of mobile situations compete for cognitive resources and then suggests that this leads to the depletion of resources for task interaction and eventually results in the breakdown of fluent interaction. RCF predictions were tested in a semi-naturalistic field study measuring attention during the performance of assigned Web search tasks on mobile phone while moving through nine varied but typical urban situations. Notably, we discovered up to eight-fold differentials between micro-level measurements of atten-tional resource fragmentation, for example from spans of over 16 seconds in a laboratory condition dropping to bursts of just a few seconds in difficult mobile situations. By cali-brating perceptual sampling, reducing resources from tasks of secondary importance, and resisting the impulse to switch tasks before finalization, participants compensated for the resource depletion. The findings are compared to previous studies in office contexts. The work is valuable in many areas of HCI dealing with mobility.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. VIII. Academic Press, NY, 1974, 47--89.
2
3
 
4
 
5
Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D. Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally, 1979.
 
6
Cowan, N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1 (2001), 87--185.
7
 
8
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New York, 1985.
 
9
 
10
Ericsson, K. A. and Kintsch, W. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102 (1995), 211--245.
11
 
12
Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. Rethinking context: an in-troduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992, 1--42.
 
13
Harris, J. and Wilkins, A.J. Remembering to do things: A theoretical framework and illustrative experiment. Human Learning, 1 (1982), 1--14.
 
14
Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cronbridge, MA, 1995.
 
15
Kjeldskov J., Skov M. B., Als B. S. and Høegh R. T. Is it worth the hassle? Exploring the added value of evaluating the usability of context-aware mobile systems in the field. In Proc. Mobile HCI 2004, 61--73.
16
 
17
Kulomäki J. and Summala H. Multitasking and Attentional Demands in Pedestrian Behaviour - A Review. Dep. of Psychology, Univ. of Helsinki. 30.6.2004.
 
18
 
19
Navon, D. and Gopher, D. On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86 (1979), 214--255.
20
 
21
Oulasvirta, A. and Tamminen, S. Temporal tensions in human-computer interaction. CHI'04 Workshop on Temporal Aspects of Work, 2004.
 
22
Oulasvirta, A. Task-processing demands and memory in web interaction: A levels-of-processing approach. Interacting with Computers, 16, 2 (2004), 217--241.
 
23
Oulasvirta, A. Human-computer interaction in mobile context: a cognitive resources perspective. Licentiate Thesis, Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, 2004. Available from http://ethesis.helsinki.fi.
24
25
 
26
27
 
28
Rogers, Y. New Theoretical approaches for Human-Computer Interaction. Annual Review of Information, Science and Technology, 38 (2004), 87--143.
 
29
Roto, V., Oulasvirta, A., Haikarainen, T., Kuorelahti, J., Lehmuskallio, H. and Nyyssonen, T. Examining mobile phone use in the wild with quasi-experimentation. HIIT Technical Report 2004-1, 2004. www.hiit.fi/publications
30
 
31
Sacks, H., Schegeloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking conversation. Language, 50 (1974), 696--735.
32
 
33
 
34
35
 
36
Weiser, M. The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American, 1991, 94--104.
 
37
Welford, A.T. The psychological refractory period and the timing of high speed performance-A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43 (1952), 2--19.
 
38
Wickens, C.D. Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman and R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. Academic Press, New York, 1984.
 
39
Young, M.S. and Stanton, N.S. Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors, 44, 3 (2002), 365--375.

CITED BY  46

Collaborative Colleagues:
Antti Oulasvirta: colleagues
Sakari Tamminen: colleagues
Virpi Roto: colleagues
Jaana Kuorelahti: colleagues