ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Alphabetically constrained keypad designs for text entry on mobile devices
Full text PdfPdf (232 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Small devices 1 table of contents
Pages: 211 - 220  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-998-5
Authors
Jun Gong  Northeastern University, Boston, MA
Peter Tarasewich  Northeastern University, Boston, MA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 34,   Downloads (12 Months): 142,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055002
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The creation of text will remain a necessary part of human-computer interaction with mobile devices, even as they continue to shrink in size. On mobile phones, text is often entered using keypads and predictive text entry techniques, which attempt to minimize the effort (e.g., number of key presses) needed to enter words. This research presents results from the design and testing of alphabetically-constrained keypads, optimized on various word lists, for predictive text entry on mobile devices. Complete enumeration and Genetic Algorithm-based heuristics were used to find keypad designs based on different numbers of keys. Results show that alphabetically-constrained designs can be found that are close to unconstrained designs in terms of performance. User testing supports the hypothesis that novice ease of learning, usability, and performance is greater for constrained designs when compared to unconstrained designs. The effect of different word lists on keypad design and performance is also discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cricket Communications. Text message lingo. (2004). Available at: https://www.mycricket.com/lingo.aspx.
2
 
3
Grover, D.L., King, M.T., and Kuschler, C.A. Patent No. US5818437, Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer. Tegic Communications, Inc., 1998.
 
4
Hasselgren, J., Montnemery, E., and Svensson, M. HMS: A predictive text entry method using bigrams. Ext. Abstracts 10th Conf. of the European Chapter of the Association of Comp. Linguistics (2003), 43--49.
 
5
 
6
How, Y. Analysis of SMS Efficiency. Undergraduate Thesis. National University of Singapore (2004).
7
8
 
9
Kreifeldt, J.G., Levine, S.L., and Iyengar, C. Reduced keyboard designs using disambiguation, Proc. of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, (1989), 441--444.
 
10
Leech, G., Rayson, P., and Wilson, A. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus, Pearson ESL (2001).
 
11
Lesher, G.W., Moulton, B.J., and Higginbotham, D.J. Optimal character arrangements for ambiguous keyboards. IEEE Trans. on Rehabilitation Engineering 6, (1998), 415--423.
 
12
Levine, S.H., and Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. Customised text entry devices for motor-impaired users. Applied Ergonomics 21, 1 (1990), 55--62.
 
13
Levine, S.H., Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., Getschow, C.O., and Minneman, S.L. Multi-character key text entry using computer disambiguation. Proc. RESNA 10th Annual Conference, (1987), 177--178.
14
15
 
16
17
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
Tarasewich, P. Towards a comprehensive model of context for mobile and wireless computing. Proc. AMCIS 2003, AIS (2003), 114--124.
23
24

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jun Gong: colleagues
Peter Tarasewich: colleagues