ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Saving and using encountered information: implications for electronic periodicals
Full text PdfPdf (472 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Document interaction table of contents
Pages: 111 - 120  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-998-5
Authors
Catherine C. Marshall  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA
Sara Bly  Sara Bly Consulting, North Plains, OR
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 156,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1054989
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As part of a focus on electronic publications, we undertook an exploratory study of how people saved and used the information they encountered while reading. In particular, we wanted to understand the role of clipping and whether it would be a necessary form of interaction with electronic publications. We interviewed 20 diverse individuals at home and at work, bringing together narrative accounts and physical and digital examples to investigate how people currently collect and use clippings from their everyday reading. All study participants had examples of materials they had deliberately saved from periodicals, ranging from ads torn from newspapers and URLs received in email messages to large stacks of magazines. Participants rarely read periodicals specifically to clip but rather recognized items of interest when they were encountered. The work highlights the importance of encountering information as an activity distinct from task-focused browsing and searching and reveals design implications for online reading and clipping technologies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., and Swenton-Wall, P. Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, D. Schuler and A. Namioka (Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1993), 123--154.
4
5
6
7
 
8
Dillon, A. Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 35, 10 (1992), 1297--1326.
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
Jones, W., Dumais, S., and Bruce, H. Once found, what then? A study of "keeping" behaviors in personal use of Web information. Proc. ASIST'02. Information Today Inc. (2002), 391--402.
 
14
Kintsch, W. and van Dijk, T.A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85 (1978), 363--394.
 
15
Levy, D.M. Scrolling Forward. NY: Arcade (2001).
16
17
 
18
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (1994).
19
 
20
 
21
Pettigrew, K.E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 35 (2001), 43--78.
22
 
23
 
24
schraefel, m.c., Zhu, Y., Modjeska, D., Wigdor, D., and Zhao, S. Hunter Gatherer. Proc. WWW'02, ACM Press (2002), 172--181.
 
25
 
26
Toms, E. G. Serendipitous Information Retrieval. Proc. First DELOS Workshop on Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries 2000. http://www.ercim.org/publication/ws-proceedings/DelNoe01/3_Toms.pdf.
 
27
Wellman B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J., and Hampton, K. Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 45, 3 (Nov. 2001), 436--455.
28
 
29
Williamson, K. Discovered by chance: The role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science Research 20, 1 (1998), 23--40.
30


Collaborative Colleagues:
Catherine C. Marshall: colleagues
Sara Bly: colleagues