Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share

ABSTRACT

Advances in location-enhanced technology are making it easier for us to be located by others. These new technologies present a difficult privacy tradeoff, as disclosing one's location to another person or service could be risky, yet valuable. To explore whether and what users are willing to disclose about their location to social relations, we conducted a three-phased formative study. Our results show that the most important factors were who was requesting, why the requester wanted the participant's location, and what level of detail would be most useful to the requester. After determining these, participants were typically willing to disclose either the most useful detail or nothing about their location. From our findings, we reflect on the decision process for location disclosure. With these results, we hope to influence the design of future location-enhanced applications and services.

REFERENCES

• 1: Mark S. Ackerman , Lorrie Faith Cranor , Joseph Reagle, Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences, Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce, p.1-8, November 03-05, 1999, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/336992.336995]
• 2: Anne Adams, Multimedia information changes the whole privacy ballgame, Proceedings of the tenth conference on Computers, freedom and privacy: challenging the assumptions, p.25-32, April 04-07, 2000, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/332186.332199]
• 3: Barkhuus, L. and Dey, A., "Location-Based Services for Mobile Telephony: a study of users' privacy concerns," Proc. of Interact '03, Zurich, 2003, pp.709--712.
• 4: Lisa Feldman Barrett , Daniel J. Barrett, An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology, Social Science Computer Review, v.19 n.2, p.175-185, June 12 2001 [doi>10.1177/089443930101900204]
• 5: James Bo Begole , John C. Tang , Randall B. Smith , Nicole Yankelovich, Work rhythms: analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 16-20, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/587078.587125]
• 6: Sunny Consolvo , Miriam Walker, Using the Experience Sampling Method to Evaluate Ubicomp Applications, IEEE Pervasive Computing, v.2 n.2, p.24-31, April 2003 [doi>10.1109/MPRV.2003.1203750]
• 7: "Enhanced 911," 911 Services section, Federal Communications Commission: http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced/ (verified Jan 4, 2005).
• 8: "Find People Nearby," mMode section, Cingular/AT&T Wireless website: http://www.attwireless.com/personal/features/organization/findfriends.jhtml (verified Jan 4, 2005).
• 9: Goguen, J., "Are Agents an Answer or a Question?" Proc. of the JSAI-Synsophy International Workshop on Social Intelligence Design, 2001.
• 10: Jason I. Hong , James A. Landay, An architecture for privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, June 06-09, 2004, Boston, MA, USA [doi>10.1145/990064.990087]
• 11: Jason I. Hong , Jennifer D. Ng , Scott Lederer , James A. Landay, Privacy risk models for designing privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing systems, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, August 01-04, 2004, Cambridge, MA, USA [doi>10.1145/1013115.1013129]
• 12: Hull, R., et al. "Enabling Context-Aware and Privacy-Conscious User Data Sharing," Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management: MDM '04, pp. 187--98.
• 13: iESP software website: http://seattleweb.intel-research.net/projects/esm/iESP.html (verified Jan 6, 2005).
• 14: Kochen, Manfred, Ed. The Small World. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1989.
• 15: Scott Lederer , I. Hong , K. Dey , A. Landay, Personal privacy through understanding and action: five pitfalls for designers, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, v.8 n.6, p.440-454, November 2004 [doi>10.1007/s00779-004-0304-9]
• 16: Scott Lederer , Jennifer Mankoff , Anind K. Dey, Who wants to know what when? privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing, CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/765891.765952]
• 17: Olson, J.S., et al. "Preferences for Privacy Sharing: Results & Directions," CREW Technical Report. 2004.
• 18: P&AB, "Consumer Privacy Attitudes: A Major Shift Since 2000 and Why," Privacy & American Business Newsletter, Vol. 10, Number 6, Sep 2003.
• 19: Leysia Palen , Paul Dourish, Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642635]
• 20: Leysia Palen , Marilyn Salzman, Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 16-20, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/587078.587092]
• 21: Sacks, H., et al. (eds), Lectures on Conversation, Blackwell Publishers Jan 1995.
• 22: Sheehan, K., "Toward a Typology of Internet Users and Online Privacy Concerns," The Information Society, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2002, pp.21--32.
• 23: Smith, I., Consolvo, S., Hightower, J., Hughes, J., Iachello, G., LaMarca, A., Scott, J., Sohn, T., Abowd, G., "Social Disclosure of Place: From Location Technology to Communication Practice," Proc of the 3rd Int'l Conf on Pervasive Computing: Pervasive '05, Munich, Germany (May 2005 - to appear).

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology; User-centered design
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Computer-supported cooperative work

Keywords:
experience sampling, location-enhanced computing, privacy, privacy classification, social relations, ubiquitous computing