ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An e-government information architecture for regulation analysis and compliance assistance
Full text PdfPdf (511 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 60 archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Delft, The Netherlands
SESSION: E-government services and policy track table of contents
Pages: 461 - 470  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-930-6
Authors
Gloria T. Lau  Stanford University
Shawn Kerrigan  Stanford University
Kincho H. Law  Stanford University
Gio Wiederhold  Stanford University
Sponsor
ICEC : International Center for Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1052220.1052279
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The complexity and diversity of government regulations make understanding the regulations a non-trivial task. One of the issues is the existence of multiple sources of regulations and interpretive guides. In this work, we propose an information infrastructure for regulation analysis, which includes a document repository and tools for compliance assistance and similarity analysis. A regulatory repository is developed based on an XML format, and important features, such as concepts and measurements, are extracted using handcrafted rules and a text mining tool. Our framework provides compliance assistance using a reasoning tool based on First Order Predicate Calculus logic, where users are alerted of detected conflicts or otherwise compliance with the regulation. A relatedness analysis is performed by comparing the extracted features as well as structural and referential information from regulations. Examples of an electronic-rulemaking scenario and a compliance checking procedure are shown to demonstrate current capabilities of the prototype system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 1999) (Oslo, Norway, 1999). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1999.
 
2
Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2001) (St. Louis, Missouri, 2000). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2001.
 
3
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities. US Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board), Washington, DC, 1999.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
British Standard 8300. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, UK, 2001.
 
11
California Building Code (CBC). California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA, 1998.
 
12
California Code of Regulations (CCR). California Office of Administrative Law, Sacramento, CA, 2003.
 
13
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2002.
14
 
15
Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. US Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board), Washington, DC, 2002.
 
16
Gibbens, M. P. California Disabled Accessibility Guidebook 2000. Builder's Book, Canoga Park, CA, 2000.
 
17
 
18
International Building Code 2000. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), Whittier, CA, 2000.
 
19
20
 
21
Lau, G., Kerrigan, S., and Law, K. An Information Infrastructure for Government Regulations. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Information Technology and Systems (WITS'03) (Seattle, WA, 2003), 2003, 37--42.
22
 
23
McCarty, T. Reflections on Taxman: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. Harvard Law Review, 90 (1977), 837--893.
 
24
McCune, W. W. Otter 3.0 Reference Manual and Guide. Technical Report, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1994.
 
25
 
26
Semio Tagger. Semio Corporation, 2002. http://www.semio.com.
 
27
Technical Standards. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2001.
 
28
Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS). US Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board), Washington, DC, 1997.
 
29
Wahlgren, P. Automation of Legal Reasoning. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, the Netherlands, 1992.
 
30
Zeleznikow, J., and Hunter, D. Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, the Netherlands, 1994.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gloria T. Lau: colleagues
Shawn Kerrigan: colleagues
Kincho H. Law: colleagues
Gio Wiederhold: colleagues