|
ABSTRACT
Over the last few years the Grid Computing research community has become interested in developing data intensive applications for the Grid. These applications face significant challenges because their widely distributed nature makes it difficult to access data with reasonable speed. In order to address this problem, we feel that the Grid community needs to develop and explore data movement challenges that represent problems encountered in these applications. In this paper, we will identify two such problems that we have dubbed the Livny Problem and the Plank-Beck Problem. We will also present data movement scheduling techniques that we have developed to address these problems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
[1] CERN homepage. http://public.web.cern.ch/ public/.
|
| |
2
|
[2] Dr. James Plank's homepage. http://www.cs.utk. edu/~plank/.
|
| |
3
|
[3] Dr. Micah Beck's homepage. http://www.cs.utk. edu/~mbeck/.
|
| |
4
|
[4] Dr. Miron Livny's homepage. http://www.cs.wisc. edu/~miron/.
|
| |
5
|
[5] European Data Grid Project homepage. http:// eu-datagrid.web.cern.ch/eu-datagrid/.
|
| |
6
|
[6] Globus Data Grid homepage. http://www.globus. org/datagrid/.
|
| |
7
|
[7] GrADS Project homepage. http://hipersoft.cs. rice.edu/grads/.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
[11] C. Baru, R. Moore, A. Rajasekar, and M. Wan. The sdsc storage resource broker, 1998.
|
| |
12
|
Alessandro Bassi , Micah Beck , Terry Moore , James S. Plank, The Logistical Backbone: Scalable Infrastructure for Global Data Grids, Proceedings of the7th Asian Computing Science Conference on Advances in Computing Science: Internet Computing and Modeling, Grid Computing, Peer-to-Peer Computing, and Cluster, p.1-12, December 04-06, 2002
|
| |
13
|
[13] M. Beynon, R. Ferreira, T. M. Kurc, A. Sussman, and J. H. Saltz. Datacutter: Middleware for filtering very large scientific datasets on archival storage systems. In IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, pages 119-134, 2000.
|
| |
14
|
[14] A. Chervenak, I. Foster, C. Kesselman, C. Salisbury, and S. Tuecke. The data grid: Towards an architecture for the distributed management and analysis of large scientific datasets, 1999.
|
| |
15
|
[15] Condor home page - http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
[18] J. Plank, M. Beck, W. Elwasif, T. Moore, M. Swany, and R. Wolski. The internet backplane protocol: Storage in the network, 1999.
|
| |
19
|
[19] J. S. Plank, S. Atchley, Y. Ding, and M. Beck. Algorithms for high performance, wide-area, distributed file downloads. Technical Report UT-CS-02-485, Department of Computer Science, University of Tennessee, October 2002.
|
| |
20
|
[20] A. Shoshani, L. M. Bernardo, H. Nordberg, D. Rotem, and A. Sim. Storage managementfor high energy physics applications. In Computing in High Energy Physics, 1998.
|
| |
21
|
[21] T. Tannenbaum and M. Litzkow. The condor distributed processing system. Dr. Dobbs Journal, February 1995.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
[23] R. F. V. D. Wijngaart and M. Frumkin. Nas grid benchmarks version 1.0. Technical Report NAS-02-005, NASA Advanced Supercomputing, July 2002.
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
|