ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A 14.6 billion degrees of freedom, 5 teraflops, 2.5 terabyte earthquake simulation on the Earth Simulator
Full text PdfPdf (1.50 MB)
Source Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing table of contents
Page: 4  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-695-1
Authors
Dimitri Komatitsch  Caltech, Pasadena, California
Seiji Tsuboi  IFREE, JAMSTEC, Yokohama, Japan
Chen Ji  Caltech, Pasadena, California
Jeroen Tromp  Caltech, Pasadena, California
Sponsor
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We use 1944 processors of the Earth Simulator to model seismic wave propagation resulting from large earthquakes. Simulations are conducted based upon the spectral-element method, a high-degree finite-element technique with an exactly diagonal mass matrix. We use a very large mesh with 5.5 billion grid points (14.6 billion degrees of freedom). We include the full complexity of the Earth, i.e., a three-dimensional wave-speed and density structure, a 3-D crustal model, ellipticity as well as topography and bathymetry. A total of 2.5 terabytes of memory is needed. Our implementation is purely based upon MPI, with loop vectorization on each processor. We obtain an excellent vectorization ratio of 99.3%, and we reach a performance of 5 teraflops (30% of the peak performance) on 38% of the machine. The very high resolution of the mesh allows us to perform fully three-dimensional calculations at seismic periods as low as 5 seconds.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] C. Bassin, G. Laske, and G. Masters. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. EOS, 81:F897, 2000.
 
2
[2] E. Chaljub. Modélisation numérique de la propagation d'ondes sismiques en géométrie sphérique: application à la sismologie globale (Numerical modeling of the propagation of seismic waves in spherical geometry: applications to global seismology). PhD thesis, Université Paris VII Denis Diderot, Paris, France, 2000.
 
3
[3] F. A. Dahlen and J. Tromp. Theoretical Global Seismology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998.
 
4
[4] A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson. Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25:297-356, 1981.
 
5
[5] D. Eberhart-Phillips, P. J. Haeussler, J. T. Freymueller, A. D. Frankel, C. M. Rubin, P. Craw, N. A. Ratchkovski, G. Anderson, G. A. Carver, A. J. Crone, T. E. Dawson, H. Fletcher, R. Hansen, E. L. Harp, R. A. Harris, D. P. Hill, S. Hreinsdottir, R. W. Jibson, L. M. Jones, R. Kayen, D. K. Keefer, C. F. Larsen, S. C. Moran, S. F. Personius, G. Plafker, B. Sherrod, K. Sieh, N. Sitar, and W. K. Wallace. The 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska: a large magnitude, slip-partitioned event. Science, 300:1113-1118, 2003.
 
6
[6] E. Faccioli, F. Maggio, R. Paolucci, and A. Quarteroni. 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudospectral domain decomposition method. J. Seismol., 1:237-251, 1997.
 
7
[7] C. Ji, D. V. Helmberger, and D. J. Wald. Preliminary slip history of the 2002 Denali earthquake. EOS Trans. AGU., 83, 2002.
 
8
[8] D. Komatitsch. Méthodes spectrales et éléments spectraux pour l'équation de l'élastodynamique 2D et 3D en milieu hétérogène (Spectral and spectral-element methods for the 2D and 3D elastodynamics equations in heterogeneous media). PhD thesis, Institut de Physique du Globe, Paris, France, 1997.
 
9
[9] D. Komatitsch and J. Tromp. Introduction to the spectral-element method for 3-D seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int., 139:806-822, 1999.
 
10
[10] D. Komatitsch and J. Tromp. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-I. Validation. Geophys. J. Int., 149:390-412, 2002.
 
11
[11] D. Komatitsch and J. Tromp. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-II. 3-D models, oceans, rotation, and self-gravitation. Geophys. J. Int., 150:303-318, 2002.
 
12
[12] D. Komatitsch and J. P. Vilotte. The spectral-element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88(2):368-392, 1998.
 
13
[13] R. A. Page, G. Plafker, and H. Pulpan. Block rotation in east-central Alaska: a framework for evaluating earthquake potential? Geology, 23:629-632, 1995.
 
14
[14] J. Ritsema, H. J. Van Heijst, and J. H. Woodhouse. Complex shear velocity structure imaged beneath Africa and Iceland. Science, 286:1925-1928, 1999.
 
15
 
16
[16] R. Sadourny. Conservative finite-difference approximations of the primitive equations on quasi-uniform spherical grids. Monthly Weather Review, 100:136-144, 1972.
 
17
[17] G. Seriani. 3-D large-scale wave propagation modeling by a spectral element method on a Cray T3E multiprocessor. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 164:235-247, 1998.
 
18

CITED BY  8
Collaborative Colleagues:
Dimitri Komatitsch: colleagues
Seiji Tsuboi: colleagues
Chen Ji: colleagues
Jeroen Tromp: colleagues