ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis and Modeling of Advanced PIM Architecture Design Tradeoffs
Full text PdfPdf (528 KB)
Source Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing table of contents
Page: 12  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:0-7695-2153-3
Authors
Ed Upchurch  California Institute of Technology
Thomas Sterling  California Institute of Technology
Jay Brockman  University of Notre Dame
Sponsor
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/SC.2004.11

ABSTRACT

A major trend in high performance computer architecture over the last two decades is the migration of memory in the form of high speed caches onto the microprocessor semiconductor die. Where temporal locality in the computation is high, caches prove very effective at hiding memory access latency and contention for communication resources. However where temporal locality is absent, caches may exhibit low hit rates resulting in poor operational efficiency. Vector computing exploiting pipelined arithmetic units and memory access address this challenge for certain forms of data access patterns, for example involving long contiguous data sets exhibiting high spatial locality. But for many advanced applications for science, technology, and national security at least some data access patterns are not consistent to the restricted forms well handled by either caches or vector processing. An important alternative is the reverse strategy; that of migrating logic in to the main memory (DRAM) and performing those operations directly on the data stored there. Processor in Memory (PIM) architecture has advanced to the point where it may fill this role and provide an important new mechanism for improving performance and efficiency of future supercomputers for a broad range of applications. One important project considering both the role of PIM in supercomputer architecture and the design of such PIM components is the Cray Cascade Project sponsored by the DARPA High Productivity Computing Program. Cascade is a Petaflops scale computer targeted for deployment at the end of the decade that merges the raw speed of an advanced custom vector architecture with the high memory bandwidth processing delivered by an innovative class of PIM architecture. The work represented here was performed under the Cascade project to explore critical design space issues that will determine the value of PIM in supercomputers and contribute to the optimization of its design. But this work also has strong relevance to hybrid systems comprising a combination of conventional microprocessors and advanced PIM based intelligent main memory.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
[3] J. Brockman, J. Zawodny, P. Kogge, and E. Johnson. Cache-in-Memory: A lower power alternative. Barcelona, Spain, June 1998. Workshop on Power-Driven Microarchitecture, held in conjunction with the International Symposium on Computer Architecture.
 
4
[4] J. B. Brockman, E. Kang, S. Kuntz, and P. Kogge. The architecture and implementation of a microserver-on-a-chip. Technical Report CSE TR02-05, University of Notre Dame CSE Dept., 2002.
5
 
6
[6] Microsoft Corporation. www.microsoft.com.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
[10] William Dally, Andrew Chang, Andrew Chien, Stuart Fiske, Waldemar Horwat, John Keen, Richard Lethin, Michael Noakes, Peter Nuth, Ellen Spertus, Deborah Wallach, and D. Scott Wills. The J-machine: A retrospective.
 
11
[11] Monty Denneau. Blue gene. In SC2000: High Performance Networking and Computing, pages 35-35, Dallas, TX, November 2000. ACM.
12
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
[17] HyPerformix Inc. www.hyperformix.com.
 
18
[18] The MathWorks Inc. www.mathworks.com.
 
19
[19] Graham Kirsch. Active memory device delivers massive parallelism. In Microprocessor Forum, San Jose, CA, October 2002.
 
20
 
21
[21] Christoforos Kozyrakis, Joseph Gebis, David Martin, Samuel Williams, Ioannis Mavroidis, Steven Pope, Darren Jones, and David Patterson. Vector IRAM: A media-enhanced vector processor with embedded DRAM. In IEEE, editor, Hot Chips 12: Stanford University, Stanford, California, August 13-15, 2000, 1109 Spring Street, Suite 300, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer Society Press.
 
22
 
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
29
[29] Burton Smith. A massively parallel shared memory computer. In ACM-SIGACT; ACM-SIGARCH, editor, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pages 123-124, Hilton Head, SC, July 1991. ACM Press.
 
30
[30] Burton J. Smith. A pipelined, shared resource MIMD computer. In Proceedings of the 1978 International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 6-8, 1978.
31
32
Collaborative Colleagues:
Ed Upchurch: colleagues
Thomas Sterling: colleagues
Jay Brockman: colleagues