ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Design process for a non-majors computing course
Full text PdfPdf (172 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
SESSION: Non-major courses table of contents
Pages: 361 - 365  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-997-7
Also published in ...
Authors
Mark Guzdial  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Andrea Forte  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1047344.1047468
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There is growing interest in computing courses for non-CS majors. We have recently built such a course that has met with positive response. We describe our design process, which includes involvement of stakeholders and identifying a context that facilitates learning. We present evaluation results on success rates (approximately 90% of the students earn an A, B, or C) and impact of the course on students over time (80% report that the class has influenced them more than a semester later).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AAUW. Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. American Association of University Women Education Foundation, New York, 2000.
 
2
ACM/IEEE. Computing Curriculum 2001. http://www.acm.org/sigcse/cc2001, 2001.
 
3
 
4
J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2000.
 
5
J. T. Bruer. Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
 
6
E. Chabrow. Declining computer-science enrollments should worry anyone interested in the future of the U.S. IT industry. InformationWeek, 2004.
 
7
 
8
M. Greenberger. Computers and the World of the Future. Transcribed recordings of lectures held at the Sloan School of Business Administration, April, 1961. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1962.
 
9
10
11
 
12
 
13
J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
 
14
L. A. Miller. Programming by non-programmers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 6:237--260, 1974.
 
15
L. A. Miller. Natural language programming: Styles, strategies, and contrasts. IBM Systems Journal, 20(2):184--215, 1981.
16
 
17
D. B. Palumbo. Programming language/problem-solving research: A review of relevant issues. Review of Educational Research, 60(1):65--89, 1990.
 
18
S. Pedroni and N. Rappin. Jython Essentials. O'Reilly and Associates, 2002.
19
20
21

CITED BY  13

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark Guzdial: colleagues
Andrea Forte: colleagues