ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Computer literacy: what students know and from whom they learned it
Full text PdfPdf (186 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
SESSION: Non-major courses table of contents
Pages: 356 - 360  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-997-7
Also published in ...
Authors
Mark E. Hoffman  Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT
David R. Vance  Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 117,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1047344.1047467
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Do new college students already know much of what has previously been taught in our computer literacy courses (assuming a functional definition of knowledge according to which students are proficient with personal computer and Internet applications)? We conducted a survey of incoming first-year students at Quinnipiac University to learn not only their skill level with a representative range of technology tasks, but also from whom they learned these tasks. Results provide a profile of students who report learning many technology tasks primarily on their own. We propose a taxonomy according to which native technology tasks are learned with family support, social and educational technology task categories are supported by friends and teachers, respectively, and optional technology tasks are learned with little support. Our results will help in the design of appropriate computer literacy courses.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alternative Learning Division. Computer Literacy Self-Assessment. Technology Literacy, (June 26, 2003), Accessed August 16, 2004. http://matcmadison.edu/ald/lab/tech/selftest.htm
 
2
Computer and Information Literacy. Teaching, Learning, & Technology Round Table, Ursuline College, May 10, 2004 , Accessed August 16, 2004. http://www.ursuline.edu/tltr/complit.htm
 
3
 
4
Horrigan, J.B. Pew Internet Project Data Memo: 55% of Adult Internet Users Have Broadband at Home or Work. Pew Internet & American Life Project (April 2004).
 
5
How Computer Literate are UC Davis Students? I.T. Times 4,3 (Nov. 1995), Accessed August 16, 2004. http://ittimes.ucdavis.edu/v4n3nov95/complit.html
 
6
Information Literacy Survey. Accessed August 16, 2004. http://www2.carthage.edu/ais/survey.htm
 
7
Oxford University Learning Technologies Group IT literacy at Oxford University. Oxford University Computing Services, Accessed August 16, 2004. http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/literacy/
 
8
Self-Survey of NC Computer Literacy Competencies. Accessed August 16, 2004. http://www.ceap.wcu.edu/ROFM_CGIv4.1/NCcompetencies.html
 
9
USDoC, A Nation Online: How Americans are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. 2002.
 
10
Williams, K. Literacy and Computer Literacy: Analyzing the NRC's 'Being Fluent with Information Technology'. University of Michigan, 2002. http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/v3n1/williams.htm

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark E. Hoffman: colleagues
David R. Vance: colleagues