ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Contrasting women's experiences in computer science at different institutions
Full text PdfPdf (121 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
PANEL SESSION: Contrasting women's experiences in computer science at different institutions table of contents
Pages: 63 - 64  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-997-7
Also published in ...
Authors
Ela Zur  The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel
Lilly Irani  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Lecia Barker  University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Mark Guzdial  Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1047344.1047379
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The SIGCSE community has produced much analysis of the dynamics causing women to choose Computer Science in disproportionately low numbers. In truth, we have learned that the factors are complex and contextual. This panel presents dynamics affecting women in four different institutions and explores the possibilities for common solutions to unique contextual problems.In the last five years, there has been extensive attention paid to the gender-gap in computer science courses (e.g., [1, 5]). Women are not succeeding in our introductory computer science courses, nor are they continuing in the curriculum, at the same rate as men. The reasons why have much to do with the context of individual courses, which can differ markedly between institutions. This panel explores how markedly different institutions can have similar outcomes, and how there may be some cross-institutional contextual issues that we might address.We will begin presenting an analysis of the results found in one university regarding the success of women in CS. Then we will present how classroom climate and the way CS is sometimes taught can lead to negative experience of studying CS at a different institution. We will suggest that interventions are necessary while students are building images of CS. We will end by presenting such an intervention that changes the classic CS1 course, and leads to changing the focus of what we're teaching.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AAUW--America Association of University Women. (2000.) Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. New York: AAUW Education Foundation.
 
2
Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & Jozefowicz, D. (1998). Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. W. B. Swann, J. H. Langlois, & L. C. Gilbert (Eds.). Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence Washington DC: American Psychological Association. 153--192.
 
3
Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4
5


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ela Zur: colleagues
Lilly Irani: colleagues
Lecia Barker: colleagues
Mark Guzdial: colleagues