ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Power modeling and architecture evaluation for FPGA with novel circuits for Vdd programmability
Full text PdfPdf (366 KB)
Source International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays archive
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM/SIGDA 13th international symposium on Field-programmable gate arrays table of contents
Monterey, California, USA
SESSION: FPGA circuit design and layout table of contents
Pages: 199 - 207  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-029-9
Authors
Yan Lin  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Fei Li  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Lei He  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1046192.1046218
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Vdd-programmable FPGAs have been proposed recently to reduce FPGA power, where Vdd levels can be customized for different circuit elements and unused circuit elements can be power-gated. In this paper, we first develop an accurate FPGA power model and then design novel Vdd-programmable interconnect switches with minimum number of configuration SRAM cells. Applying our power model to placed and routed benchmark circuits, we evaluate Vdd-programmable FPGA architecture using the new switches. The best architecture in our study uses Vdd-programmable logic blocks and Vdd-gateable interconnects. Compared to the baseline architecture similar to the leading commercial architecture, the best architecture reduces the minimal energy-delay product by 44.14% with 48% area overhead and 3% SRAM cell increase. Our evaluation results also show that LUT size 4 always gives the lowest energy consumption while LUT size 7 always leads to the highest performance for all evaluated architectures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
T. Tuan and B. Lai, "Leakage power analysis of a 90nm FPGA," in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., 2003.
5
 
6
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
G. G. Lemieux and S. D. Brown, "A detailed router for allocating wire segments in field-programmable gate arrays," in Proceedings of the ACM Physical Design Workshop, April 1993.
 
13
S. S. Sapatnekar, V. B. Rao, P. M. Vaidya, and S. M. Kang, "An exact solution to the transistor sizing problem for CMOS circuits using convex optimization," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 12, pp. 1621--1634, Nov. 1993.
 
14
U. of Berkeley Device~Group, "Predictive technology model," in http://www.device.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ptm/mosfet.html, 2002.
 
15
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor in http://public.itrs.net/, 2002.
 
16
S. Trimberger, "Private conversation," 2003.
 
17
J. Rose et al, "Architecture of field-programmable gate arrays: The effect of logic functionality on area efficiency," ISSCC, 1990.
18
 
19
Xilinx Corporation, "Virtex-II 1.5v platform FPGA complete data sheet," July 2002.
 
20
M. Hamada and et al, "A top-down low power design technique using clustered voltage scaling with variable supply-voltage scheme," in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., pp. 495--498, 1998.

CITED BY  8